You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/66441
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGianini, P. T. R.-
dc.contributor.authorPiovesan, A. C.-
dc.contributor.authorMesquita, J. L. B.-
dc.contributor.authorRomão, R. L. P.-
dc.contributor.authorArap, S.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:20:14Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:16:54Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:20:14Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:16:54Z-
dc.date.issued2001-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/janeiro_2001/Gianini_46_49.pdf-
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Journal of Urology, v. 27, n. 1, p. 46-49, 2001.-
dc.identifier.issn1517-6878-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/66441-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/66441-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Penile fracture is a rare injury, usually resulting from direct trauma to the erect penis during sexual intercourse. Our goal was to evaluate the best diagnostic methods and the late complications following surgical treatment of penile fracture. Material and Methods: We studied retrospectively 11 patients with penile fracture in a period of 10 years (1985-1995). Results: In 55% of the cases, the injury occurred during sexual intercourse. All patients presented with a very suggestive clinical picture (pain, detumescence and hematoma) and only 2 were submitted to further investigation (ultrasonography) to confirm the diagnosis. Only one patient had urethral bleeding and therefore was submitted to retrograde urethrogram, which confirmed urethral injury. All patients were treated by immediate surgery, through a circular subcoronal incision and degloving of the penis to allow a thorough exploration. All patients had a tunica albuginea tear that was promptly repaired, and 2 patients (18%) had associated urethral injury (one had no symptoms) that was also repaired. All patients did very well after surgery and only one had a mild curvature, which did not hinder intercourse during follow-up (18 months). Conclusions: Penile fracture has very typical clinical signs and, therefore, further investigation is usually unnecessary. Early surgical treatment is associated with a low incidence of late complications.en
dc.format.extent46-49-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAlbuginea rupture-
dc.subjectCoitus-
dc.subjectCorpus cavernosum-
dc.subjectPenis-
dc.subjectTrauma-
dc.subjectadult-
dc.subjectbleeding-
dc.subjectclinical article-
dc.subjectclinical feature-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectechography-
dc.subjectfracture-
dc.subjecthematoma-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectpain-
dc.subjectpenis disease-
dc.subjectretrospective study-
dc.subjectsexual intercourse-
dc.subjectsurgical technique-
dc.subjecttreatment outcome-
dc.subjecttunica albuginea-
dc.subjecturethra-
dc.subjecturethra injury-
dc.subjecturethrography-
dc.titleLong-term outcome of penile fracture treatmenten
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDivisão Clín. Urol. School of Medicine State Univ. of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, São Paulo, SP 05422-970-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-0035075237.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Urology-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0035075237-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.