You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/66503
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGandini, Marcia R. E. A. Schiavon-
dc.contributor.authorGandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga-
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Joel C. da Rosa-
dc.contributor.authorDel Santo Júnior, Marinho-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:20:15Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:17:01Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:20:15Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:17:01Z-
dc.date.issued2001-05-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.113266-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, v. 119, n. 5, p. 531-538, 2001.-
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/66503-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/66503-
dc.description.abstractMaxillary basal bone, dentoalveolar, and dental changes in Class II Division 1 patients treated to normal occlusion by using cervical headgear and edgewise appliances were retrospectively evaluated. A sample of 45 treated patients was compared with a group of 30 untreated patients. Subjects were drawn from the Department of Orthodontics, Araraquara School of Dentistry, Brazil, and ranged in age from 7.5 to 13.5 years. The groups were matched based on age, gender, and malocclusion. Roughly 87% of the treated group had a mesocephalic or brachicephalic pattern, and 13% had a dolicocephalic pattern. Cervical headgear was used until a Class I dental relationship was achieved. Our results demonstrated that the malocclusions were probably corrected by maintaining the maxillary first molars in position during maxillary growth. Maxillary basal bone changes (excluding dentoalveolar changes) did not differ significantly between the treated and the untreated groups. Molar extrusion after the use of cervical headgear was not supported by our data, and this must be considered in the treatment plan of patients who present similar facial types. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:531-9).en
dc.format.extent531-538-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectcase control study-
dc.subjectcephalometry-
dc.subjectgrowth, development and aging-
dc.subjectmalocclusion-
dc.subjectmaxilla-
dc.subjectmolar tooth-
dc.subjectnonparametric test-
dc.subjectorthodontic device-
dc.subjectskull base-
dc.subjecttreatment outcome-
dc.subjectExtraoral Traction Appliances-
dc.subjectMalocclusion, Angle Class II-
dc.subjectMolar-
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric-
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleEffects of cervical headgear and edgewise appliances on growing patientsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Orthodontics Araraquara School of Dentistry UNESP, Araraquara-
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Odontol. de Araraquara Departamento de Clinica Infantil, Rua Humaita, 1680, 14801-903 Araraquara-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Orthodontics Araraquara School of Dentistry UNESP, Araraquara-
dc.identifier.doi10.1067/mod.2001.113266-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000168707900017-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0040156365-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.