You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67203
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSakomura, N. K.-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, R.-
dc.contributor.authorCouto, H. P.-
dc.contributor.authorCoon, C.-
dc.contributor.authorPacheco, C. R.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:20:37Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:18:27Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:20:37Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:18:27Z-
dc.date.issued2003-03-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.3.419-
dc.identifier.citationPoultry Science, v. 82, n. 3, p. 419-427, 2003.-
dc.identifier.issn0032-5791-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/67203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67203-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to determine models for ME requirements for broiler breeder pullets using the factorial method. The influence of the temperature on maintenance ME requirements was determined by experiments conducted in three environmental rooms with temperature kept constant at 15, 22, and 30°C, using the comparative slaughter technique. The energy requirements for weight gain were determined based on the body energy content and efficiency of energy utilization for weight gain. Two ME requirement models for each age were developed using the coefficients for maintenance and weight gain. The models for 3 to 8 wk were ME = W 0.75 (186.52 - 1.94T) + 2.47WG, and ME = W 0.75 (174 - 1.88T) + 2.83WG; for 9 to 14 wk, ME = W 0.75 (186.52 - 1.94T) + 2.69WG, and ME = W 0.75 (174 - 1.88T) + 2.50WG; and 15 to 20 wk, ME = W 0.75 (186.52 - 1.94T) + 2.76WG, and ME = W 0.75 (174 - 1.88T) + 3.24WG. In these equations, W is BW (kg), T is temperature (°C), and WG is daily weight gain (g). These models were compared to the breeder's recommendations in a feeding trial from 5 to 20 wk of age. Models 1 and 2 provided energy intakes that promoted BW smaller than the breeder's recommendation. However, all breeder pullets had weights above the standard recommendation. Model 2 gave the smallest ME intake and BW close to the standard recommendation and provided the best prediction of ME requirements.en
dc.format.extent419-427-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectBroiler breeder pullet-
dc.subjectComparative slaughter technique-
dc.subjectEnergy model-
dc.subjectFactorial method-
dc.subjectMetabolizable energy requirement-
dc.titleModeling metabolizable energy utilization in broiler breeder pulletsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Arkansas-
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade Cie. Agrarias Veterinarias Campus de Jaboticabal Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701-
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculdade Cie. Agrarias Veterinarias Campus de Jaboticabal Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ps/82.3.419-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000181757400012-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofPoultry Science-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0038209821-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.