You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67216
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmaira, Sumaia Inaty-
dc.contributor.authorKerr-Corrêa, Florence-
dc.contributor.authorContel, José Onildo B.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:20:37Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:18:29Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:20:37Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:18:29Z-
dc.date.issued2003-03-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462003000100005-
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, v. 25, n. 1, p. 18-25, 2003.-
dc.identifier.issn1516-4446-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/67216-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67216-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Psychiatric consultation (PC) has been considered an efficient tool to develop research, to track and to give assistance benefiting patients, health professionals and the institution. However, it has not been much used in Brazil. Although 30 to 50% of general hospital (GH) inpatients may present a psychiatric disorder, only 1 to 12% of them are referred to assessment. The aims of this study were: to assess mental disorders in a GH; to identify which of these patients are sent to psychiatric care; to verify alleged reasons for referral to psychiatric consultation, and to examine the relationship between PC and psychiatric learning (during medical school and residence). Methods: A case-control patient study was conducted (47 cases and 94 controls) to analyze in detail the following variables: socio-demographic; clinical; degree of information (about the disease and diagnostic/therapeutic procedures), and relationship between patient and health team. Psychiatric diagnoses were made according to the ICD- 10 criteria. The Self Report Questionnaire (SRQ), the CAGE and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) were used as well as a specifically designed questionnaire to collect clinical and demographic data. Results: Behavioral alterations, either of elation or of depression, were the main for requesting a PC; 95.8% of the cases and 27.7% of the controls had a mental disorder. Organic mental disorders and alcohol-related disorders were the most frequent diagnoses in group I (cases), while anxiety, depressive and alcohol-related disorders were predominant in group II (controls). Control group patients were better informed and more able to establish an appropriate relationship with the health team than case patients. The logistic regression showed CAGE-positive patients having 12.85 times greater risk of being referred to PC, followed by unemployed patients (2.44 times more PC referrals). Discussion: The SRQ and CAGE were quite useful in the screening of possible patients and might be important for medical students to learn and use as generalists. Further research is needed to verify if and how the newly-established service will improve the diagnostic and treatment skills of our students.en
dc.format.extent18-25-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectCase- control study-
dc.subjectGeneral hospital-
dc.subjectPsychiatric consultation-
dc.subjectPsychiatric disorders-
dc.subjectadult-
dc.subjectalcoholism-
dc.subjectanxiety disorder-
dc.subjectcase control study-
dc.subjectclinical article-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectdepression-
dc.subjectfemale-
dc.subjectgeneral hospital-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectmental disease-
dc.subjectorganic psychosyndrome-
dc.subjectpatient referral-
dc.subjectpsychiatric diagnosis-
dc.subjectquestionnaire-
dc.subjectrating scale-
dc.subjectself report-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectCase-Control Studies-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectHospitals, General-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectMental Disorders-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectMultivariate Analysis-
dc.subjectPsychiatric Department, Hospital-
dc.subjectReferral and Consultation-
dc.titlePsychiatric disorders and psychiatric consultation in a general hospital: A case- control studyen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionMed. Sch. of Stt. Univ. of S. Paulo-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Neurology Med. Sch. of Stt. Univ. of S. Paulo, Botucatu, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Neurology Med. School of Botucatu of the UNESP, Botucatu, SP-
dc.description.affiliationMedical School of Ribeirao Preto University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepto. de Neurologia e Psiquiatria Fac. de Med. de Botucatu - UNESP, Rua Rubião Jr, s/n, 18618-970 Botucatu, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Neurology Med. School of Botucatu of the UNESP, Botucatu, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepto. de Neurologia e Psiquiatria Fac. de Med. de Botucatu - UNESP, Rua Rubião Jr, s/n, 18618-970 Botucatu, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1516-44462003000100005-
dc.identifier.scieloS1516-44462003000100005-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-0037352977.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Psiquiatria-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0037352977-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.