You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67417
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShibli, Jamil Awad-
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Marilia Compagnoni-
dc.contributor.authorLotufo, Roberto Fraga Moreira-
dc.contributor.authorMarcantonio Júnior, Elcio-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:20:54Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:18:53Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:20:54Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:18:53Z-
dc.date.issued2003-09-29-
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?article_id=1063-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 18, n. 3, p. 383-390, 2003.-
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/67417-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67417-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The goal of this study was to evaluate microbiota and radiographic peri-implant bone loss associated with ligature-induced peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six dental implants with 4 different surfaces (9 commercially pure titanium, 9 titanium plasma-sprayed, 9 hydroxyapatite, and 9 acid-etched) were placed in the edentulous mandibles of 6 dogs. After 3 months with optimal plaque control, abutment connection was performed. On days 0, 20, 40, and 60 after placement of cotton ligatures, both microbiologic samples and periapical radiographs were obtained. The presence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia/nigrescens, Campylobacter spp, Capnocytophaga spp, Fusobacterium spp, beta-hemolytic Streptococcus, and Candida spp were evaluated culturally. Results: P intermedia/nigrescens was detected in 13.89% of implants at baseline and 100% of implants at other periods. P gingivalis was not detected at baseline, but after 20 and 40 days it was detected in 33.34% of implants and at 60 days it was detected in 29.03% of dental implants. Fusobacterium spp was detected in all periods. Streptococci were detected in 16.67% of implants at baseline and in 83.34%, 72.22%, and 77.42% of implants at 20, 40, and 60 days, respectively. Campylobacter spp and Candida spp were detected in low proportions. The total viable count analysis showed no significant differences among surfaces (P = .831), although a significant difference was observed after ligature placement (P < .0014). However, there was no significant qualitative difference, in spite of the difference among the periods. The peri-implant bone loss was not significantly different between all the dental implant surfaces (P = .908). Discussion and Conclusions: These data suggest that with ligature-induced peri-implantitis, both time and periodontal pathogens affect all surfaces equally after 60 days.en
dc.format.extent383-390-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAnimal study-
dc.subjectDental implants-
dc.subjectPeri-implantitis-
dc.subjectPeriodontal diseases-
dc.subjectSurface characteristics-
dc.subjecthydroxyapatite-
dc.subjecttitanium-
dc.subjectActinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans-
dc.subjectanimal experiment-
dc.subjectanimal model-
dc.subjectbeta hemolytic Streptococcus-
dc.subjectbone radiography-
dc.subjectCampylobacter-
dc.subjectCandida-
dc.subjectCapnocytophaga-
dc.subjectcementation-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectdog-
dc.subjectedentulousness-
dc.subjectFusobacterium-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectmetal implantation-
dc.subjectmicrobiological examination-
dc.subjectmicrobiological parameters-
dc.subjectmicroorganism detection-
dc.subjectnonhuman-
dc.subjectosteolysis-
dc.subjectPorphyromonas gingivalis-
dc.subjectPrevotella intermedia-
dc.subjectPrevotella nigrescens-
dc.subjectprosthesis infection-
dc.subjectquantitative analysis-
dc.subjectstatistical significance-
dc.subjectsurface property-
dc.subjecttooth implantation-
dc.subjecttreatment outcome-
dc.titleMicrobiologic and radiographic analysis of ligature-induced peri-implantitis with different dental implant surfacesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionGuarulhos University-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDental Research Division Department of Periodontology Guarulhos University, Guarulhos, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araraquara State University of São Paulo, Araraquara, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Dental School of São Paulo University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Periodontia Faculdade Odontol. Araraquara-UNESP, R. Humaitá, 1680, 14801-903 Araraquara-SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Periodontia Faculdade Odontol. Araraquara-UNESP, R. Humaitá, 1680, 14801-903 Araraquara-SP-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000183428600008-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0041418178-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.