You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67428
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSampaio, José Eduardo Cezar-
dc.contributor.authorRached, Ricardo Samih Georges Abi-
dc.contributor.authorPilatti, Gibson Luiz-
dc.contributor.authorTheodoro, Letícia Helena-
dc.contributor.authorBatista, Luiz Henrique Carvalho-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:20:54Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:18:55Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:20:54Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:18:55Z-
dc.date.issued2003-10-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-74912003000400005-
dc.identifier.citationPesquisa odontológica brasileira = Brazilian oral research, v. 17, n. 4, p. 319-325, 2003.-
dc.identifier.issn1806-8324-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/67428-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67428-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare the removal of root surface smear layer following active application of EDTA gel and EDTA-T (texapon) gel in different concentrations (5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 24%), using scanning electron microscopy. A total of 220 dentin blocks obtained from the root surfaces of extracted teeth were divided into 3 groups: Group I - (control) application of saline solution (n = 20); Group II - EDTA gel (pH 7.0) was applied in the following concentrations: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 24% (n = 100); Group III - EDTA-T gel (pH 7.0) applied in the same concentrations described above (n = 100). The photomicrographs were evaluated by one calibrated examiner using a smear layer removal index and following statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis test). The results demonstrated that the specimens treated with EDTA and EDTA-T gel presented a better smear layer removal than the control group (p < 0.01); no statistically significant differences were observed between the EDTA and EDTA-T groups and between the concentrations tested (Mann-Whitney, p > 0.05). Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that all treatment modalities effectively removed the smear layer from the root surface. The addition of texapon into the EDTA gel formulation did not increase its effectiveness.en
dc.format.extent319-325-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectdodecyl sulfate sodium-
dc.subjectedetic acid-
dc.subjectsurfactant-
dc.subjecttexapon-
dc.subjectclinical trial-
dc.subjectcomparative study-
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trial-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectdental surgery-
dc.subjectdrug effect-
dc.subjectepidemiology-
dc.subjectgel-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectnonparametric test-
dc.subjectpremolar tooth-
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial-
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopy-
dc.subjecttime-
dc.subjecttooth brushing-
dc.subjecttooth root-
dc.subjectultrastructure-
dc.subjectBicuspid-
dc.subjectEdetic Acid-
dc.subjectGels-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning-
dc.subjectSampling Studies-
dc.subjectSmear Layer-
dc.subjectSodium Dodecyl Sulfate-
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric-
dc.subjectSurface-Active Agents-
dc.subjectTime Factors-
dc.subjectTooth Root-
dc.subjectToothbrushing-
dc.titleEffectiveness of EDTA and EDTA-T brushing on the removal of root surface smear layer.en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1517-74912003000400005-
dc.identifier.scieloS1517-74912003000400005-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-4944222295.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofPesquisa Odontológica Brasileira = Brazilian Oral Research-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-4944222295-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.