You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67534
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEcher, M. M.-
dc.contributor.authorGuimarães, V. F.-
dc.contributor.authorMinami, K.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:20:59Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:19:08Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:20:59Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:19:08Z-
dc.date.issued2003-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.actahort.org/books/607/607_16.htm-
dc.identifier.citationActa Horticulturae, v. 607, p. 109-116.-
dc.identifier.issn0567-7572-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/67534-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67534-
dc.description.abstractThis objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different methods of red beet seedling production and direct sowing on the development of the plant in field conditions. 'Tall Top Early Wonder' was used as the cultivar. The experimental design was a randomized blocks with 4 replications of each treatment: T1 - seedling produced in trays of 288 cells; T2 - 200 cells; T3 - 128 cells; T4 - 128 cells; T5 - direct sowing and T6 - bare-root seedling. The seedlings produced in trays and bare root seedlings were transplanted in the field 28 DAS with spacing of 0.20 x 0.10m. The mean height of plants, leaf area, leaf dry matter, petiole dry matter, shoot dry matter, root dry matter, relationship between shoot dry matter and root dry matter, absolute growth rate, relative growth rate, net assimilation rate, leaf area ratio and specific leaf area were determined. Storage root fresh matter and mean storage root diameter were determined starting from 77 DAS. Initial growth of the plants were superior for the direct sowing, resulting in smaller RGR and NAR than the other treatments. Independent of the production method, an increase of the cycle of the crop was verified. T6 had larger delay in the initial development. There was no difference for productivity. Method T1, had less expenses with respect to substrate and space in the vegetation home, without reduction in production.en
dc.format.extent109-116-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectBeet-
dc.subjectBeta vulgaris l.-
dc.subjectDry matter-
dc.subjectGrowth analysis-
dc.subjectSeedlings-
dc.titleGrowth and yield analysis in different methods of beet (Cv. 'tall top early wonder') plantationen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDept. of Vegetable Production ESALQ USP, CP. 09, 13.418-900, Piracicaba, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDept. of Vegetable Production FCA UNESP, CP. 237 18.603-970, Botucatu, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDept. of Vegetable Production FCA UNESP, CP. 237 18.603-970, Botucatu, SP-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofActa Horticulturae-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84879637902-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.