You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67554
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro Jr., Paulo Domingos-
dc.contributor.authorSanches, Marcio Giampietro-
dc.contributor.authorOkamoto, Tetuo-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:20:59Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:19:11Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:20:59Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:19:11Z-
dc.date.issued2003-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2007452/-
dc.identifier.citationAnesthesia progress, v. 50, n. 4, p. 169-180, 2003.-
dc.identifier.issn0003-3006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/67554-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67554-
dc.description.abstractPostanesthetic pain is a relatively common complication after local anesthesia. This complication may be caused by the anesthetic technique or by the anesthetic solution used. Tissue reactions induced by the anesthetic solutions may be one of the factors resulting in pain after anesthesia. The objective of this study was to comparatively analyze tissue reactions induced by different anesthetic solutions in the subcutaneous tissue of rats. The following solutions were utilized: 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor; a 0.5% bupivacaine solution with 1:200,000 adrenaline; a 4% articaine solution and 2% mepivacaine, both with 1:100,000 adrenaline; and a 0.9% sodium chloride solution as a control. Sterilized absorbent paper cones packed inside polyethylene tubes were soaked in the solutions and implanted in the subcutaneous region. The sacrifice periods were 1, 2, 5, and 10 days after surgery. The specimens were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological analysis. The results showed that there is a difference in tissue irritability produced by the local anesthetic solutions. The results also showed that there is no relation between the concentration of the drug and the inflammatory intensity, that the mepivacaine and articaine solutions promoted less inflammatory reaction than the bupivacaine, and that the lidocaine solution produced the least intense inflammation.en
dc.format.extent169-180-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectadrenalin-
dc.subjectarticaine-
dc.subjectbupivacaine-
dc.subjectirritant agent-
dc.subjectlidocaine-
dc.subjectlocal anesthetic agent-
dc.subjectmepivacaine-
dc.subjectsodium chloride-
dc.subjectvasoconstrictor agent-
dc.subjectanimal-
dc.subjectcomparative study-
dc.subjectdermatitis-
dc.subjectdrug effect-
dc.subjectdrug implant-
dc.subjectlymphocyte-
dc.subjectmacrophage-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectneutrophil-
dc.subjectpathology-
dc.subjectrat-
dc.subjectskin-
dc.subjecttime-
dc.subjectWistar rat-
dc.subjectAnesthetics, Local-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectBupivacaine-
dc.subjectCarticaine-
dc.subjectDermatitis-
dc.subjectDrug Implants-
dc.subjectEpinephrine-
dc.subjectIrritants-
dc.subjectLidocaine-
dc.subjectLymphocytes-
dc.subjectMacrophages-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectMepivacaine-
dc.subjectNeutrophils-
dc.subjectRats-
dc.subjectRats, Wistar-
dc.subjectSkin-
dc.subjectSodium Chloride-
dc.subjectTime Factors-
dc.subjectVasoconstrictor Agents-
dc.titleComparative analysis of tissue reactions to anesthetic solutions: histological analysis in subcutaneous tissue of rats.en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-1542319219.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofAnesthesia progress-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-1542319219-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.