You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67930
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDe Freitas, Rilke Tadeu Fonseca-
dc.contributor.authorDe Gonçalves, Tarcísio Moraes-
dc.contributor.authorDe Oliveira, Antonio Ilson Gomes-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Daniel Furtado-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:11Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:20:01Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:11Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:20:01Z-
dc.date.issued2004-11-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982004000800015-
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 33, n. 6 SUPPL. 2, p. 2037-2043, 2004.-
dc.identifier.issn1516-3598-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/67930-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67930-
dc.description.abstractTo establish the measures that best define the quality of the carcass of swine, data of lean meat yield (MY), fat yield (FY), dressing percentage (DP), carcass length for the Brazilian Method ofCarcass Classification (CLBM). carcass length for the American Method of Carcass Classification (CLAM), average backfat thickness (ABT), backfat thickness 4 cm from the dorsal mid-line (P 1). backfat thickness 6.5 cm from the dorsal mid-line (P 2), backfat thickness 8 cm from the dorsal mid-line (P 3), loin eye area (LEA), lean:fat ratio (LFR) and ham yield (HY) were used, obtained in 664 Large White swine. Initially, in order to make clear the importance and possible relations structures among variables, the cluster analysis was used. Afterwards, the multiple regression linear model was used, using the SAS package. Firstly, it was estimated the partial correlation (Type II) of each trait to evaluate the importance of the quality variables of the carcass. Secondly, a procedure of adjusting equation selection named Backward was used. It was verified that, except for DP, all the measures of carcass classification evaluated presented correlation with MY and FY. The measures ABT, P 1. P 2, P 3 and LFT were inversely correlated with MY and directly correlated with FY. The opposite was observed for the measures CLBM. CLAM, LEA and IIY. ABT, AOL. RCG and RP are just enough to evaluate the quality of the carcass in terms of lean meat yield, and, in terms of FY. besides these measured previous it's necessary the evaluation of P 1. The measures of loin eye area and average backfat thickness, as proposed by MBCC. shown as being what best evaluates the amount of meat and fat in the carcass.en
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.format.extent2037-2043-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectCluster analysis-
dc.subjectCorrelation-
dc.subjectMeat and fat yield-
dc.subjectPieris brassicae-
dc.subjectSus scrofa-
dc.titleAvaliação de carcaças de suínos da raça large white utilizando medidas convencionaispt
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of large white pig carcass using conventional measuresen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDZO UFLA, CP 37, 37200-000 - Lavras, MG-
dc.description.affiliationDZO UFLA Doutorando - UNESP Botucatu Bolsista CNPq-
dc.description.affiliationTitular Aposentado UFLA-
dc.description.affiliationDEX UFLA-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDZO UFLA Doutorando - UNESP Botucatu Bolsista CNPq-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1516-35982004000800015-
dc.identifier.scieloS1516-35982004000800015-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-31544467072.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-31544467072-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.