You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67943
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPrakki, Anuradha-
dc.contributor.authorCilli, Renato-
dc.contributor.authorSaad, João Otávio Chalup-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, José Roberto-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:11Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:20:02Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:11Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:20:02Z-
dc.date.issued2004-11-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/qi/abstract.php?iss2_id=386&article_id=4824-
dc.identifier.citationQuintessence International, v. 35, n. 10, p. 785-789, 2004.-
dc.identifier.issn0033-6572-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/67943-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67943-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of proximal contacts in Class II restorations using two types of matrix bands (steel and polyester) with two different restoration techniques (incremental and with prepolymerized particles). Method and materials: Eighty-eight Class II adjacent restorations using Prodigy resin composite were performed: 44 with the incremental technique (22 with steel matrix bands, 22 with polyester matrix bands) and 44 utilizing prepolymerized resin particles (22 steel matrix, 22 polyester matrix). The restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Proximal contacts obtained immediately after restoration procedure in all restorations were satisfactory. Results: No statistically significant alterations were found in 18 months of evaluation. Conclusion: Regardless of the utilized resin composite, there were no differences in the amount of proximal contact variations with respect to tested techniques and matrices.en
dc.format.extent785-789-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectClass II cavity-
dc.subjectClinical trial-
dc.subjectLong-term study-
dc.subjectProximal contact-
dc.subjectResin composite-
dc.subjectRestorative technique-
dc.subjectpolyester-
dc.subjectresin-
dc.subjectsteel-
dc.subjectclinical article-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectdental care-
dc.subjectdental caries-
dc.subjectdental equipment-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectstatistical significance-
dc.subjecttechnique-
dc.subjectAcid Etching, Dental-
dc.subjectComposite Resins-
dc.subjectDental Cavity Preparation-
dc.subjectDental Polishing-
dc.subjectDental Restoration, Permanent-
dc.subjectDentin-Bonding Agents-
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectMatrix Bands-
dc.subjectPolyesters-
dc.subjectSteel-
dc.subjectSurface Properties-
dc.titleClinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorationsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationBauru Dental School São Paulo State University, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Operative Dentistry S. José Dos Campos Dent. Sch. Paulista State University, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliation, Rua São Gonçalo 6-73, Bauru, Sao Paulo, CEP 17043-170-
dc.description.affiliationUnespBauru Dental School São Paulo State University, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Operative Dentistry S. José Dos Campos Dent. Sch. Paulista State University, São Paulo-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofQuintessence International-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-4944224962-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.