You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67967
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShibli, Jamil Awad-
dc.contributor.authorTheodoro, Letícia Helena-
dc.contributor.authorHaypek, Patricia-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Valdir Gouveia-
dc.contributor.authorMarcantonio Júnior, Elcio-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:12Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:20:05Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:12Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:20:05Z-
dc.date.issued2004-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000148553.06311.f1-
dc.identifier.citationImplant Dentistry, v. 13, n. 4, p. 342-351, 2004.-
dc.identifier.issn1056-6163-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/67967-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/67967-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this investigation was to evaluate the cleaning effect of CO 2 on surface topography and composition of failed dental implant surfaces. Ten failed dental implants were retrieved from nine patients (mean age, 46.33 ± 5.81 years) as a result of early or late failure. The implants were divided into two parts: one side of the implant was irradiated with a CO 2 laser (test side), while the other side did not receive irradiation (control side). The CO 2 laser was operated at 1.2 W in a continuous wave for 40 seconds (40 J energy). The handpiece of the CO 2 laser was kept at a distance of 30 mm from the implant surface, resulting in a spot area of 0.031415 cm 2 (38.20 W/cm 2; 1559 J/cm 2) in scanning mode (cervical-apical). One unused dental implant was used as a negative control for both groups. All implant surfaces were examined by scanning electron mi croscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectrometer x-ray (EDS) for element analysis. SEM showed that the surface of the test sides consisted of different degrees of organic residues, appearing mainly as dark stains similar to those observed on the control sides. None of the test surfaces presented alterations such as crater-like alterations, lava-like layers, or melting compared with the nonirradiated surfaces. Foreign elements such as carbon, oxygen, sodium, calcium, and aluminum were detected on both sides. These results suggest that CO 2 laser irradiation does not modify the implant surface, although the cleaning effect was not satisfactory.en
dc.format.extent342-351-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectCo 2 laser-
dc.subjectDental implants-
dc.subjectFailures-
dc.subjectPeri-implantitis-
dc.subjectScanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)-
dc.subjectTitanium-
dc.subjectaluminum-
dc.subjectcalcium-
dc.subjectcarbon-
dc.subjectcarbon dioxide-
dc.subjectoxygen-
dc.subjectsodium-
dc.subjectadult-
dc.subjectaged-
dc.subjectclinical article-
dc.subjectenergy-
dc.subjectfemale-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectirradiation-
dc.subjectlaser-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectscanning electron microscope-
dc.subjectspectrometry-
dc.subjectsurface property-
dc.subjecttooth implantation-
dc.subjecttopography-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectCarbon Dioxide-
dc.subjectDental Implantation, Endosseous-
dc.subjectDental Implants-
dc.subjectDental Restoration Failure-
dc.subjectDevice Removal-
dc.subjectElectron Probe Microanalysis-
dc.subjectEquipment Contamination-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectLasers-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectOxides-
dc.subjectSurface Properties-
dc.titleThe effect of CO 2 laser irradiation on failed implant surfacesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionGuarulhos University-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de Marília (UNIMAR)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Guarulhos-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Dental Research Division Guarulhos University, Guarulhos, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araraquara State University of Sao Paulo-UNESP, Araraquara, SP-
dc.description.affiliationExp. Lab. Laser in Dentistry-LELO Dental School of Sao Paulo University of Sao Paulo, USP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araçatuba State University of Sao Paulo-UNESP, Araçatuba, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDental School of Marília University of Marília, Marília, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araraquara State Univ. of São Paulo-UNESP, Araraquara, SP-
dc.description.affiliationCtro. de Pos-Graduacao Pesquisa e Extensão-CEPPE Universidade Guarulhos, Praça Tereza Cristina 1, 07023-070 Guarulhos-SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araraquara State University of Sao Paulo-UNESP, Araraquara, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araçatuba State University of Sao Paulo-UNESP, Araçatuba, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araraquara State Univ. of São Paulo-UNESP, Araraquara, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.id.0000148553.06311.f1-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofImplant Dentistry-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-11444259656-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.