You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68054
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlvarenga, Vera Lucy de Santi-
dc.contributor.authorFerraz, P. F.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:14Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:20:18Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:14Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:20:18Z-
dc.date.issued2004-12-01-
dc.identifier.citationRevista de Ciencias Farmaceuticas, v. 25, n. 1, p. 53-57, 2004.-
dc.identifier.issn0101-3793-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68054-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68054-
dc.description.abstractStrongyloidiasis, a relatively common parasitism in tropical and sub-tropical areas, is the result of the infection by the smaller nematode, the Strongyloides stercoralis. Humans can be infected by this parasite, which has in its vital cycle free-life forms of male and female individuals able to live in the ground, and with another step necessary parasitism in the intestinal wall. The diagnostic of the infection is routinely done by the microscopic observation of the larva in stool samples and the high sensibility of urn method over another one allows an trustable and efficient diagnostic. The efficiency of three methods (Direct, COPROTEST and Rugai) used in the Parasitology Sector of the NAC-LACAL in Araraquara (SP) to diagnosis the strongiloidiasis were evaluated. A number of 2346 samples of stool of patients from NAC-LACAL and Nestor Goulart Reis Hospital were analyzed in the period between August and December of 2002. The Rugai Method with an positivity index of 65 % was elected as the most efficient of thee ones.en
dc.format.extent53-57-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectDiagnostic, methods comparison-
dc.subjectStrongyloides stercoralis-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectdiagnostic approach route-
dc.subjectdiagnostic test-
dc.subjectfeces analysis-
dc.subjectintermethod comparison-
dc.subjectlarval stage-
dc.subjectlife cycle-
dc.subjectnonhuman-
dc.subjectparasite identification-
dc.subjectparasite isolation-
dc.subjectstrongyloidiasis-
dc.titleAvaliação da eficiência dos métodos Direto, COPROTEST e Rugai no diagnóstico da estrongiloidíasept
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of the efficiency of the Direct, COPROTEST and Rugai methods on the diagnosis of strongyloidiasisen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Análises Clínicas Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas UNESP, 14801-902-Araraquara-SP-
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas UNESP, 14801-902-Araraquara-SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Análises Clínicas Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas UNESP, 14801-902-Araraquara-SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas UNESP, 14801-902-Araraquara-SP-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista de Ciencias Farmaceuticas-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-27444436310-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.