You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68056
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBraoios, A.-
dc.contributor.authorPizzolitto, Antonio Carlos-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:14Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:20:18Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:14Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:20:18Z-
dc.date.issued2004-12-01-
dc.identifier.citationRevista de Ciencias Farmaceuticas, v. 25, n. 1, p. 41-45, 2004.-
dc.identifier.issn0101-3793-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68056-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68056-
dc.description.abstractA hundred and ninety-five (195) strains of Enterobacter spp., isolated from diverse clinical specimens - urine, feces, cateter, blood, wound, tracheal aspirate, vaginal fluid - were submitted to the conventional identification by biochemical tests, and were also submitted to the identification by panels NegCombo 20 of the system automated MicroScan - AutoScan- 4 (Dade Behring Inc., West Sacramento, CA, USA). The samples were from patients of the Clinical Laboratory from the School of Pharmacy and Biochemistry of UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, SP, and from patients hospitalized at the University Hospital Domingos Leonardo Cerávolo, UNOESTE. Of the total of strains tested, 191 (97.9%) presented agreement between the two approaches utilized and 4 strains (2.1%) presented identification disagreement, that is, the genus identified was different in each approach. By this study, the conclusion is that both the approaches utilized for the identification presented advantages and disadvantages related to the cost, facility of execution, quickness, reliability and some other characteristics. Even so, our results showed that conventional methods represent a reliable tool for Enterobacter identification.en
dc.format.extent41-45-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAutomated identification-
dc.subjectBiochemical identification-
dc.subjectEnterobacter-
dc.subjectEnterobacteriaceae-
dc.subjectMicroscan-
dc.subjectbacterial strain-
dc.subjectbacterium detection-
dc.subjectbacterium identification-
dc.subjectbacterium isolate-
dc.subjectbacterium isolation-
dc.subjectblood-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectfeces analysis-
dc.subjectgenus-
dc.subjectintermethod comparison-
dc.subjectlaboratory automation-
dc.subjectnonhuman-
dc.subjecttracheobronchial toilet-
dc.subjectuniversity hospital-
dc.subjecturine-
dc.subjecturine catheter-
dc.subjectvagina discharge-
dc.subjectwound-
dc.titleIdentificação de Enterobacter spp. através de técnicas convencionais e do sistema semi-automatizado Microscan (Autoscan-4)pt
dc.title.alternativeIdentification of Enterobacter spp. by conventional techniques and automated system Microscan (Autoscan-4)en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Análises Clínicas Faculdade de Farmácia e Bioquímica Universidade do Oeste Paulista - UNOESTE, 19050-680 - Presidente Prudente - SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Análises Clínicas Faculdade de Ciéncias Farmacêuticas UNESP, 14801-902 - Araraquara - SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Análises Clínicas Faculdade de Ciéncias Farmacêuticas UNESP, 14801-902 - Araraquara - SP-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista de Ciencias Farmaceuticas-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-27444439542-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.