You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68229
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRigolizzo, Maurício Bruhns-
dc.contributor.authorCamilli, José Angelo-
dc.contributor.authorFrancischone, Carlos Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorPadovani, Carlos Roberto-
dc.contributor.authorBrånemark, Per-Ingvar-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:19Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:20:43Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:19Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:20:43Z-
dc.date.issued2005-05-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?article_id=1799-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 20, n. 3, p. 441-447, 2005.-
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68229-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68229-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate zygomatic bone thickness considering a possible relationship between this parameter and cephalic index (Cl) for better use of Cl in the implant placement technique. Materials and Methods: Cl was calculated for 60 dry Brazilian skulls. The zygo matic bones of the skulls were divided into 13 standardized sections for measurement. Bilateral measurements of zygomatic bone thickness were made on dry skulls. Results: Sections 5, 6, 8, and 9 were appropriate for implant anchorage in terms of location. The mean thicknesses of these sections were 6.05 mm for section 5, 3.15 mm for section 6, 6.13 mm for section 8, and 4.75 mm for section 9. In only 1 section, section 8, did mean thickness on 1 side of of the skull differ significantly from mean thickness on the other side (P <.001). Discussion: For the relationship between quadrant thick ness and Cl, sections 6 and 8 varied independently of Cl. Section 5 associated with brachycephaly, and section 9 associated with subbrachycephaly, presented variations in the corresponding thickness. Conclusion: Based on the results, implants should be placed in sections 5 and 8, since they presented the greatest thickness, except in brachycephalic subjects, where thickness was greatest in section 5, and in subbrachycephalic subjects, where thickness was greatest in section 9. Cl did not prove to be an appropriate parameter for evaluating zygomatic bone thickness for this sampling.en
dc.format.extent441-447-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAtrophic maxilla-
dc.subjectCephalic index-
dc.subjectDental implants-
dc.subjectZygomatic bone-
dc.subjectadolescent-
dc.subjectadult-
dc.subjectaged-
dc.subjectbone regeneration-
dc.subjectbrachycephaly-
dc.subjectBrazil-
dc.subjectcalculation-
dc.subjectcephalometry-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectcraniofacial synostosis-
dc.subjectfemale-
dc.subjecthistology-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjecthuman tissue-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectmaxilla-
dc.subjectmethodology-
dc.subjectparameter-
dc.subjectpathology-
dc.subjectscoring system-
dc.subjectskull-
dc.subjectstandardization-
dc.subjectstatistical significance-
dc.subjectthickness-
dc.subjecttooth implantation-
dc.subjectzygoma-
dc.subjectAdolescent-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over-
dc.subjectCephalometry-
dc.subjectCraniosynostoses-
dc.subjectDental Implantation, Endosseous-
dc.subjectDental Implants-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectOsseointegration-
dc.subjectSkull-
dc.subjectZygoma-
dc.titleZygomatic bone: Anatomic bases for osseointegrated implant anchorageen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade do Sagrado Coração de Bauru-
dc.contributor.institutionMaster of Science School-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionBrånemark Osseointegration Center-
dc.description.affiliationBrånemark Osseointegration Center Universidade do Sagrado Coração de Bauru-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Anatomy Universidade do Sagrado Coração de Bauru-
dc.description.affiliationMaster of Science School Department of Implantology-
dc.description.affiliationOperative Dentistry Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Statistics Universidade do Sagrado Coração de Bauru-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Statistics Universidade Estadual de São Paulo, Botucatu-
dc.description.affiliationBrånemark Osseointegration Center, Göteborg-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Statistics Universidade Estadual de São Paulo, Botucatu-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000229786800012-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-21344474586-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.