You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68662
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorValandro, Luiz Felipe-
dc.contributor.authorAndreatta Filho, Osvaldo Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorValera, Márcia Carneiro-
dc.contributor.authorMaximo de Araujo, Maria Amélia-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:45Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:21:41Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:21:41Z-
dc.date.issued2005-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/jad/abstract.php?iss2_id=805&article_id=9312&article=10&title=The#.U0QH-PldV1Y-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 7, n. 4, p. 331-336, 2005.-
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68662-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68662-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the pullout strength of a glass fiber-reinforced composite post (glass FRC) cemented with three different adhesive systems and one resin cement. The null hypothesis was that pullout strengths yielded by the adhesive systems are similar. Materials and Methods: Thirty bovine teeth were selected. The size of the specimens was standardized at 16 mm by sectioning off the coronal portion and part of the root. The specimens were divided into three groups, according to the adhesive system, which were applied following the manufacturers' instructions: G1, ScotchBond Multi-Purpose Plus; G2, Single Bond; G3, Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus. The glass FRCs (Reforpost) were etched with 37% H3PO4 for 1 min and silanized (Porcelain Primer). Thereafter, they were cemented with the dual resin cement En-Force. The specimens were stored for 24 h, attached to an adapted device, and submitted to the pullout test in a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). The data were submitted to the one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results: G1 (30.2 ± 5.8 Kgf) displayed the highest pullout strength (p < 0.001) when compared to G2 (18.6 ± 5.8 Kgf) and G3 (14.3 ± 5.8 Kgf), which were statistically similar. Analysis of the specimens revealed that all failures occurred between the adhesive system and the root dentin (pullout of the post cement), regardless of group. Conclusion: The multiple-bottle, total-etch adhesive system provided higher pullout strength of the glass FRC when compared to the single-bottle, total-etch, and single-step self-etching adhesive systems. The null hypothesis was rejected (p < 0.001).en
dc.format.extent331-336-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAdhesive systems-
dc.subjectBovine teeth-
dc.subjectFiber post-
dc.subjectPullout strength-
dc.subjectbisphenol A bis(2 hydroxypropyl) ether dimethacrylate-
dc.subjectdentin bonding agent-
dc.subjectEnForce Sure Cure-
dc.subjectEnForce-Sure Cure-
dc.subjectglass-
dc.subjectglass fiber-
dc.subjectONE STEP PLUS-
dc.subjectONE-STEP PLUS-
dc.subjectphosphoric acid-
dc.subjectresin-
dc.subjectresin cement-
dc.subjectScotchbond Multi Purpose Plus-
dc.subjectScotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus-
dc.subjectsilane derivative-
dc.subjectsingle bond-
dc.subjecttooth cement-
dc.subjectTyrian SPE-
dc.subjectanimal-
dc.subjectcattle-
dc.subjectchemistry-
dc.subjectdental acid etching-
dc.subjectdental bonding-
dc.subjectdental care-
dc.subjectdentin-
dc.subjectinstrumentation-
dc.subjectmechanical stress-
dc.subjecttooth crown-
dc.subjecttooth pulp-
dc.subjectultrastructure-
dc.subjectAcid Etching, Dental-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectBisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate-
dc.subjectCattle-
dc.subjectComposite Resins-
dc.subjectDental Bonding-
dc.subjectDental Cements-
dc.subjectDental Pulp Cavity-
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis-
dc.subjectDentin-
dc.subjectDentin-Bonding Agents-
dc.subjectGlass-
dc.subjectPhosphoric Acids-
dc.subjectPost and Core Technique-
dc.subjectResin Cements-
dc.subjectSilanes-
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical-
dc.titleThe effect of adhesive systems on the pullout strength of a fiberglass-reinforced composite post system in bovine teethen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Santa Maria-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics São José Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 97015-372-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Prosthodontics São José Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000234119700010-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesive Dentistry-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-30144434278-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.