You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68904
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Patricia Itocazo-
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Alessandra Bühler-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, José Roberto-
dc.contributor.authorArrais, César Augusto Galvão-
dc.contributor.authorGiannini, Marcelo-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:52Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:22:14Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:52Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:22:14Z-
dc.date.issued2006-06-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242006000100010-
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Oral Research, v. 20, n. 1, p. 52-58, 2006.-
dc.identifier.issn1806-8324-
dc.identifier.issn1807-3107-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68904-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68904-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dentin surface treatments on the tensile bond strength (TBS) of the self-etching primer Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) and the one-step self-etching One-Up Bond F (OUB). The exposed flat dentin surfaces of twenty-four sound third molars were prepared with diamond bur at high-speed, carbide bur at low-speed or wet ground with #600 grit SiC paper. The adhesive systems were applied to the dentin surfaces and light-cured according to the manufacturers' instructions. A 6-mm high composite crown was incrementally built-up and each increment was light-cured for 40 seconds. After being stored in water (37°C/24 h), the samples were serially sectioned parallel to the long axis, forming beams (n = 20) with a cross-sectional area of approximately 0.8 mm 2. The specimens were tested in a Universal Testing Machine at 0.5 mm/min. The cross-sectional area was measured and the results (MPa) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey Test (p < 0.05). Overall, the groups treated with CSE exhibited the highest TBS for all surface treatments. Dentin surfaces prepared with carbide bur at low speed reduced TBS in the CSE group; however, OUB was not affected by surface treatments. The effect of surface abrasive methods on TBS was material-dependent.en
dc.format.extent52-58-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectDentin-
dc.subjectDentin-bonding agents-
dc.subjectTensile strength-
dc.subjectadhesive agent-
dc.subjectClearfil SE Bond-
dc.subjectdentin bonding agent-
dc.subjectmethacrylic acid derivative-
dc.subjectOne Up Bond F-
dc.subjectOne-Up-Bond F-
dc.subjectresin cement-
dc.subjectchemistry-
dc.subjectdental acid etching-
dc.subjectdental bonding-
dc.subjectdentin-
dc.subjectdrug effect-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectmaterials testing-
dc.subjectshear strength-
dc.subjectAcid Etching, Dental-
dc.subjectAdhesives-
dc.subjectDental Bonding-
dc.subjectDentin-Bonding Agents-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectMaterials Testing-
dc.subjectMethacrylates-
dc.subjectResin Cements-
dc.subjectShear Strength-
dc.titleEffect of dentinal surface preparation on bond strength of self-etching adhesive systemsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry São Paulo State University, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry of Piracicaba State University of Campinas, Campinas-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry São Paulo State University, São Paulo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1806-83242006000100010-
dc.identifier.scieloS1806-83242006000100010-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-33744821685.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Oral Research-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33744821685-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.