You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68932
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKatz, Ieoschua-
dc.contributor.authorda Cunha, Antonio Ribeiro-
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Antonio de Pádua-
dc.contributor.authorde Herdani, Egberto Egon-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:53Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:22:19Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:53Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:22:19Z-
dc.date.issued2006-07-01-
dc.identifierhttp://200.145.140.50/ojs1/viewarticle.php?id=44&layout=abstract-
dc.identifier.citationIrriga, v. 11, n. 3, p. 328-338, 2006.-
dc.identifier.issn1413-7895-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68932-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68932-
dc.description.abstractPlan disease control techniques are used through the irrigation water, which reduces the labor and it improves application uniformity with smaller contact of the operator with toxic products, lower environmental impact and lower production cost. In order to control Botrytis cinerea the lisianthus culture, this work aimed to evaluate two fungicide application methods with different treatments. The fungicides were: thiophanate methyl (50 g i.a. L-1), thiophanate methyl + chlorothalonil (50 g i.a. L-1 + 35 g i.a. L-1) and iprodione (50 g i.a. L-1). Number of lesions, number of diseased floral buttons and height of the lisianthus plants were evaluated. It was possible to deduce, that in the growth stage (number of lesions in the plant) as well as in the final stage (number of floral buttons) of the lisianthus culture, the most efficient treatments were 2 (thiophanate methyl + chlorothalonil) and 3 (iprodione). Considering that treatment 2 is a mixture of two fungicides, a systemic and a contact one, independently of application methods, the mixture increased efficiency in relation to treatment 1 (thiophanate methyl). Thus, chemigation was as efficient as spreading technique.en
dc.format.extent328-338-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectChemigation-
dc.subjectDisease control-
dc.subjectDrip irrigation-
dc.subjectLisianthus-
dc.subjectFungicides-
dc.subjectIrrigation-
dc.subjectPlants (botany)-
dc.subjectSpraying-
dc.subjectdisease control-
dc.subjectdrip irrigation-
dc.subjectfungal disease-
dc.subjectfungicide-
dc.subjectpesticide application-
dc.subjectplant-
dc.subjectBotryotinia fuckeliana-
dc.subjectBotrytis-
dc.subjectEustoma grandiflorum-
dc.titleComparação de dois métodos de aplicação de fungicidas, irrigação por gotejamento e pulverização convencional no controle do mofo cinzento (Botrytis cinerea Pers.: Fr.) em vasos com plantas de lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn.)pt
dc.title.alternativeComparison of two methods of fungicide application, drip irrigation and conventional spraying control for cinereous mildew (Cenerea botrytis Pers.:Fr.) in potted plants of lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn.)en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Engenharia Rural Faculdade de Ciëncias Agronömicas Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Recursos Naturais Faculdade de Ciëncias Agronömicas Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Engenharia Rural Faculdade de Ciëncias Agronömicas Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Recursos Naturais Faculdade de Ciëncias Agronömicas Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-33750920716.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofIrriga-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33750920716-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.