You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68938
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Ana Lucia-
dc.contributor.authorVergani, Carlos Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorGiampaolo, Eunice Teresinha-
dc.contributor.authorPavarina, Ana Claudia-
dc.contributor.authorMagnani, Romeo-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:53Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:22:19Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:53Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:22:19Z-
dc.date.issued2006-07-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00112.x-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics, v. 15, n. 4, p. 235-242, 2006.-
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X-
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68938-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68938-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Potential effects on hardness and roughness of a necessary and effective disinfecting regimen (1% sodium hypocholorite and 4% chlorhexidine) were investigated for two hard chairside reline resins versus a heat-polymerizing denture base acrylic resin. Materials and Methods: Two standard hard chairside reliners (Kooliner and Duraliner II), one heat-treated chairside reliner (Duraliner II +10 minutes in water at 55°C), and one standard denture base material (Lucitone 550) were exposed to two disinfecting solutions (1% sodium hypochlorite; 4% chlorhexidine gluconate), and tested for two surface properties [Vickers hardness number (VHN, kg/mm2); Roughness (Ra, μm)] for different times and conditions (1 hour after production, after 48 hours at 37 ± 2°C in water, after two disinfection cycles, after 7 days in disinfection solutions, after 7 days in water only). For each experimental condition, eight specimens were made from each material. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test, and Student's t-test (p= 0.05). Results: For Kooliner (from 6.2 ± 0.3 to 6.5 ± 0.5 VHN) and Lucitone 550 (from 16.5 ± 0.4 to 18.4 ± 1.7 VHN), no significant changes in hardness were observed either after the disinfection or after 7 days of immersion, regardless of the disinfectant solution used. For Duraliner II (from 4.0 ± 0.1 to 4.2 ± 0.1 VHN), with and without heat treatment, a small but significant increase in hardness was observed for the specimens immersed in the disinfectant solutions for 7 days (from 4.3 ± 0.2 to 4.8 ± 0.5 VHN). All materials showed no significant change in roughness (Kooliner: from 0.13 ± 0.05 to 0.48 ± 0.24 μm; Duraliner II, with and without heat treatment: from 0.15 ± 0.04 to 0.29 ± 0.07 μm; Lucitone 550: from 0.44 ± 0.19 to 0.49 ± 0.15 μm) after disinfection and after storage in water for 7 days. Conclusions: The disinfectant solutions, 1% sodium hypochlorite and 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, caused no apparent damage on hardness and roughness of the materials evaluated. Copyright © 2006 by The American College of Prosthodontists.en
dc.format.extent235-242-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectDenture base acrylic resins-
dc.subjectDisinfection-
dc.subjectHard chairside reline resins-
dc.subjectHardness-
dc.subjectRemovable prostheses-
dc.subjectRoughness-
dc.subjectacrylic acid resin-
dc.subjectchlorhexidine-
dc.subjectchlorhexidine gluconate-
dc.subjectdisinfectant agent-
dc.subjectdrug derivative-
dc.subjecthypochlorite sodium-
dc.subjectchemistry-
dc.subjectdenture-
dc.subjectdrug effect-
dc.subjecthardness-
dc.subjectsurface property-
dc.subjecttime-
dc.subjectAcrylic Resins-
dc.subjectChlorhexidine-
dc.subjectDenture Rebasing-
dc.subjectDisinfectants-
dc.subjectSodium Hypochlorite-
dc.subjectSurface Properties-
dc.subjectTime Factors-
dc.titleEffect of disinfectants on the hardness and roughness of reline acrylic resinsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School UNESP - São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara - UNESP Departamento de Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Araraquara, SP, 14801-903-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School UNESP - São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara - UNESP Departamento de Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Araraquara, SP, 14801-903-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00112.x-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33745576539-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.