You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69059
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUrban, Vanessa Migliorini-
dc.contributor.authorDe Souza, Raphael Freitas-
dc.contributor.authorGalvao Arrais, Cesar Augusto-
dc.contributor.authorBorsato, Karina Tostes-
dc.contributor.authorVaz, Luis Geraldo-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:57Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:22:36Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:57Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:22:36Z-
dc.date.issued2006-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00130.x-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics, v. 15, n. 5, p. 295-299, 2006.-
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X-
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69059-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69059-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluated the ultimate tensile strength of a tissue conditioner without nystatin incorporation (GI - control group) and the same tissue conditioner modified by the addition of nystatin in two concentrations: GII - 500,000 International Units (U) and GIII - 1,000,000 U, in which each milligram of the medicament corresponded to 6079 U. Materials and Methods: Dumbbell-shaped specimens (N = 7) with a central cross-sectional area of 33 × 6 × 3 mm were produced for the three experimental groups. After polymerization following manufacturer's instructions, specimens were immersed in distilled water at 37°C for either 24 hours or 7 days and then tested in tension in the MTS 810 at 40 mm/minute. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test, at 95% level of confidence. Results: The means (force-grams (gf) ± standard deviation) of the ultimate tensile strength were: GI - 634.29 ± 122.80; GII - 561.92 ± 133.56; and GIII - 547.30 ± 73.47 for 24-hour storage, and GI - 536.68 ± 54.71; GII - 467.50 ± 143.51; and GIII - 500.62 ± 159.76 for 7-day storage. There were no statistically significant differences among the three experimental groups (p > 0.05). The ultimate tensile strength means of all experimental groups after 7 days were significantly lower than those observed after 24 hours (p = 0.04). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the addition of nystatin into the tissue conditioner investigated in concentrations below 1,000,000 U did not affect its ultimate tensile strength. Copyright © 2006 by The American College of Prosthodontists.en
dc.format.extent295-299-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAntifungal agent-
dc.subjectCandida albicans-
dc.subjectDenture stomatitis-
dc.subjectUTS-
dc.subjectalcohol-
dc.subjectantifungal agent-
dc.subjectmethacrylic acid methyl ester-
dc.subjectnystatin-
dc.subjectphthalic acid dibutyl ester-
dc.subjectplasticizer-
dc.subjectanalysis of variance-
dc.subjectdental care-
dc.subjectdenture-
dc.subjectdrug storage-
dc.subjectmaterials testing-
dc.subjectreparative dentistry-
dc.subjectstomatitis-
dc.subjecttensile strength-
dc.subjectthrush-
dc.subjecttime-
dc.subjectAnalysis of Variance-
dc.subjectAntifungal Agents-
dc.subjectCandidiasis, Oral-
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis-
dc.subjectDenture Liners-
dc.subjectDibutyl Phthalate-
dc.subjectDrug Storage-
dc.subjectEthanol-
dc.subjectMaterials Testing-
dc.subjectMethylmethacrylate-
dc.subjectNystatin-
dc.subjectPlasticizers-
dc.subjectStomatitis, Denture-
dc.subjectTensile Strength-
dc.subjectTime Factors-
dc.subjectTissue Conditioning (Dental)-
dc.titleEffect of the association of nystatin with a tissue conditioner on its ultimate tensile strengthen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Faculty of Odontology of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Piracicaba School of Dentistry University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationAraraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School-UNESP, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Centro, CEP: 14801-903, Araraquara, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespAraraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School-UNESP, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Centro, CEP: 14801-903, Araraquara, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00130.x-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33748373174-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.