You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69163
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlbas, Avelino-
dc.contributor.authorFontolan, O. L.-
dc.contributor.authorPardo, P. E.-
dc.contributor.authorBremer Neto, H.-
dc.contributor.authorSartori, Alexandrina-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:22:49Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:00Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:22:49Z-
dc.date.issued2006-10-05-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-91992006000300010-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases, v. 12, n. 3, p. 476-486, 2006.-
dc.identifier.issn1678-9199-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69163-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69163-
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we compared the levels of neutralizing antibodies induced by inactivated rabies vaccine in cattle by using three alternative immunization procedures. Forty-five bovines (breed nelore) were then organized in three groups (A, B and C, with 15 animals/group). Group A received only one vaccine dose at day zero and Group B received the first dose at day zero and then another dose at day 30 (early booster). Group C was also immunized with two doses; however, the booster was postponed until day 180 after the first dose (delayed booster). Blood samples were withdrawn at days zero (before the first dose) and 30, 210, 390, and 540 after the beginning of immunization and the antibody titers were evaluated by mouse neutralization test. The protocol used to immunize Group C (booster at day 180) was clearly more efficient. In this group, antibody levels were higher and also remained higher for longer periods in comparison with the other two groups. These results show that booster timing significantly affected antibody levels. Therefore, programs addressed to control this disease in cattle should consider not only the use of a booster but also its administration time.en
dc.format.extent476-486-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAntibody-
dc.subjectCattle-
dc.subjectNeutralization-
dc.subjectRabies-
dc.subjectVaccine-
dc.subjectBos taurus-
dc.titleInterval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabiesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)-
dc.contributor.institutionAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Tropical Diseases and Diagnostic Imaging Botucatu School of Medicine São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo State-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo State-
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Veterinary Medicine UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, SP-
dc.description.affiliationPólo Regional da Alta Sorocabana APTA, Caixa Postal 298, Presidente Prudente, SP, 19001-970-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Tropical Diseases and Diagnostic Imaging Botucatu School of Medicine São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo State-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo State-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1678-91992006000300010-
dc.identifier.scieloS1678-91992006000300010-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000246281600010-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-33749168367.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33749168367-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.