You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69202
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCaputo, Fabrizio-
dc.contributor.authorDe Oliveira, Mariana Fernandes Mendes-
dc.contributor.authorDenadai, Benedito Sérgio-
dc.contributor.authorGreco, Camila Coelho-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:01Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:22:54Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:01Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:22:54Z-
dc.date.issued2006-11-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-86922006000600019-
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, v. 12, n. 6, 2006.-
dc.identifier.issn1517-8692-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69202-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69202-
dc.description.abstractThe amount of metabolic energy spent in transporting the body mass of the subject over a unit of distance has been defined as the energy cost of locomotion, or regarding to swimming, cost of swimming. The differences in the cost of swimming between the individuals seem to be influenced by two main factors, the hydrodynamic resistance and technical skill of the swimmer. The lower cost of swimming showed by females has been attributed to a smaller hydrodynamic resistance due to their smaller size, larger percentage fat and more streamlined position. However, the difference in cost of swimming between males and females disappears when correcting for body size. With regard to children, the higher energy cost of swimming when correcting for body size may be caused by the lower swimming technique showed by them. For individuals with the same anthropometric characteristics, the better swimming technique and larger size of propelling surface, associated with higher propelling efficiency, may decrease the energy cost of swimming. When comparing different types of strokes, the most economical stroke is crawl, followed by backstroke, irrespective the swimming velocity. Butterfly is the less economical at low velocities (< 0.8 m·s-1). However, above that velocity the breaststroke become the less economical stroke.en
dc.language.isopor-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectChildren-
dc.subjectCost of swimming-
dc.subjectGender-
dc.subjectSwimming strokes-
dc.titleFatores intrínsecos do custo energético da locomoção durante a nataçãopt
dc.title.alternativeIntrinsic factors of the locomotion energy cost during swimmingen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Avaliação da Performance Humana UNESP, Rio Claro, SP-
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Avaliação da Performance Humana IB-UNESP, Avenida 24A, 1.515, 13506-900 - Rio Claro, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespLaboratório de Avaliação da Performance Humana UNESP, Rio Claro, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespLaboratório de Avaliação da Performance Humana IB-UNESP, Avenida 24A, 1.515, 13506-900 - Rio Claro, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1517-86922006000600019-
dc.identifier.scieloS1517-86922006000600019-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-34347397797.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-34347397797-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.