You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69225
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDe Castro Villela, Iraídes Aparecida-
dc.contributor.authorSilveira, José Luz-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:02Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:22:57Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:02Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:22:57Z-
dc.date.issued2006-11-14-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1115/GT2006-91090-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, v. 2, p. 945-951.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69225-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69225-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper a comparative analysis of the environmental impact caused by the use of natural gas and diesel in thermoelectric power plants utilizing combined cycle is performed. The objective is to apply a thermoeconomical analysis in order to compare the two proposed fuels. In this analysis, a new methodology that incorporates the economical engineering concept to the ecological efficiency once Cardu and Baica [1, 2], which evaluates, in general terms, the environmental impacts caused by CO2, SO2, NOx and Particulate Matter (PM), adopting as reference the air quality standards in vigour is employed. The thermoeconomic model herein proposed utilizes functional diagrams that allow the minimization the Exergetic Manufacturing Cost, which represents the cost of production of electricity incorporating the environmental impact effects to study the performance of the thermoelectric power plant [3,4], It follows that it is possible to determine the environmental impact caused by thermoelectric power plants and, under the ecological standpoint, the use of natural gas as a fuel is the best option compared to the use of the diesel, presenting ecological efficiency values of 0.944 and 0.914 respectively. From the Exergoeconomic point of view of, it was found out that the EMC (Exergetic Manufacturing Cost) is better when natural gas is used as fuel compared to the diesel fuel. Copyright © 2006 by ASME.en
dc.format.extent945-951-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectEcological efficiency-
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact-
dc.subjectThermoeconomical analysis-
dc.subjectExergetic Manufacturing Cost (EMC)-
dc.subjectDiesel fuels-
dc.subjectMathematical models-
dc.subjectNatural gas-
dc.subjectParticles (particulate matter)-
dc.subjectThermoelectricity-
dc.subjectPower plants-
dc.titleThermoeconomic model considering the environment impacts on thermoelectric power plants: Natural gas versus dieselen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationCollege of Chemical Engineering FAENQUIL, Rodovia Itajuba Lorena, s/n, km 74,5, Lorena - SP, 12600-970-
dc.description.affiliationEnergy Department São Paulo State University UNESP, Av. Dr. Ariberto Pereira Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá - SP, 12516-410-
dc.description.affiliationUnespEnergy Department São Paulo State University UNESP, Av. Dr. Ariberto Pereira Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá - SP, 12516-410-
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/GT2006-91090-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33750808190-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.