You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69564
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Mauricio Ribeiro-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Vanessa Camila-
dc.contributor.authorMiqui, Miriam Nakatani-
dc.contributor.authorSakima, Tatsuko-
dc.contributor.authorSpolidório, Denise Madalena Palomari-
dc.contributor.authorCirelli, Joni Augusto-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:25Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:23:39Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:25Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:23:39Z-
dc.date.issued2007-03-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0361:EOUEAM]2.0.CO;2-
dc.identifier.citationAngle Orthodontist, v. 77, n. 2, p. 361-366, 2007.-
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69564-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69564-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This crossover study compared the efficacy of an ultrasonic toothbrush for the reduction of plaque, gingival inflammation, and levels of Streptococcus mutans, in relation to an electric and a manual toothbrush. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients with orthodontic appliances were divided into three groups. All patients were evaluated by a periodontist and samples of saliva were collected for quantification of S mutans. The patients received their first brushes with appropriate instructions. For each crossover leg, patients used each toothbrush for a period of 30 days. At the end of each washout period, participants received a periodontal evaluation and new samples of saliva were collected. After 15 days of using their own toothbrushes, patients received the next toothbrushes in the experimental sequence. Results: The ultrasonic brush group presented significant improvement in the reduction of visible plaque on the buccal surfaces (-6.36%, P = .007). The counts of S mutans decreased in the electric (2.04 × 105 to 1.36 × 105 colony-forming units [CFU]/mL) and ultrasonic (2.98 × 105 to 1.84 × 105 CFU/mL) groups. There were no statistical differences among the three brushes for the clinical and microbiological parameters evaluated. Conclusions: This study did not demonstrate that the ultrasonic toothbrush was better in reducing gingival inflammation in adolescent orthodontic patients, but plaque scores were lowered on buccal surfaces of teeth with orthodontic brackets. In addition, S mutans counts were markedly decreased in the electric and ultrasonic groups, which should be related to a reduced risk of oral disease. © 2006 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.en
dc.format.extent361-366-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectElectric toothbrushes-
dc.subjectFixed orthodontic appliance-
dc.subjectOral hygiene-
dc.subjectStreptococcus mutans-
dc.subjectadolescent-
dc.subjectbacterial count-
dc.subjectchild-
dc.subjectclinical trial-
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trial-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectelectricity-
dc.subjectepidemiology-
dc.subjectfemale-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectinstrumentation-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectmicrobiology-
dc.subjectorthodontic device-
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial-
dc.subjectsaliva-
dc.subjecttooth brushing-
dc.subjecttooth plaque-
dc.subjectultrasound therapy-
dc.subjectAdolescent-
dc.subjectChild-
dc.subjectColony Count, Microbial-
dc.subjectDental Plaque-
dc.subjectElectricity-
dc.subjectEpidemiologic Methods-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectOrthodontic Appliances-
dc.subjectSaliva-
dc.subjectToothbrushing-
dc.subjectUltrasonic Therapy-
dc.titleEfficacy of ultrasonic, electric and manual toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliancesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionAssocia Ção Paulista DDS Cirurgiões-Dentistas-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University-Araraquara Dental School Department of Diagnosis and Surgery Division of Periodontics, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University-Araraquara Dental School Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationAssocia Ção Paulista DDS Cirurgiões-Dentistas, Araraquara, SP-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University-Araraquara Dental School Department of Physiology and Pathology, Araraquara, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University-Araraquara Dental School Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Araraquara, SP 14801-903-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University-Araraquara Dental School Department of Diagnosis and Surgery Division of Periodontics, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University-Araraquara Dental School Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University-Araraquara Dental School Department of Physiology and Pathology, Araraquara, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University-Araraquara Dental School Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Araraquara, SP 14801-903-
dc.identifier.doi10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0361:EOUEAM]2.0.CO;2-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofAngle Orthodontist-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33947263591-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.