You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69572
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJorge, André Luiz Cervantes-
dc.contributor.authorde Araújo, Maria Amélia Máximo-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:26Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:23:40Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:26Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:23:40Z-
dc.date.issued2007-03-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/qi/abstract.php?iss2_id=226&article_id=2650-
dc.identifier.citationQuintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985), v. 38, n. 3, 2007.-
dc.identifier.issn0033-6572-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69572-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69572-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of cavity design and photocuring method on the marginal seal of resin composite restorations. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Seventy-two bovine teeth were divided into 2 groups: group 1 received box-type cavity preparations, and group 2 received plate-type preparations. Each group was divided into 3 subgroups. After etching and bonding, Z250 resin composite (3M Espe) was applied in 2 equal increments and cured with 1 of 3 techniques: (1) conventional curing for 30 seconds at 650 mW/cm2; (2) 2-step photocuring, in which the first step was performed 14 mm from the restoration for 10 seconds at 180 mW/cm2 and the second step was performed in direct contact for 20 seconds at 650 mW/cm2; or (3) progressive curing using Jetlite 4000 (J. Morita) for 8 seconds at 125 mW/cm2 and then 22 seconds at 125 mW/cm2 up to 500 mW/cm2. The specimens were thermocycled for 500 cycles and then submitted to dye penetration with a 50% silver nitrate solution. Microleakage was assessed using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey test (5% level of significance). RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between groups when a double interaction between photocuring and cavity preparation was considered (P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: No one type of cavity preparation or photocuring method prevented micro-leakage. The plate-type preparation showed the worst dye penetration when conventional and progressive photocuring methods were used. The best results were found using the 2-step photocuring with the plate-type preparation.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectacrylic acid resin-
dc.subjectComposite Dental Resin-
dc.subjectpolyurethan-
dc.subjectresin-
dc.subjectunclassified drug-
dc.subjectanimal-
dc.subjectcattle-
dc.subjectchemistry-
dc.subjectdental surgery-
dc.subjectendodontics-
dc.subjectmethodology-
dc.subjectradiation exposure-
dc.subjecttooth disease-
dc.subjectAcrylic Resins-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectCattle-
dc.subjectComposite Resins-
dc.subjectDental Cavity Preparation-
dc.subjectDental Leakage-
dc.subjectMarginal Adaptation (Dentistry)-
dc.subjectPolyurethanes-
dc.titleInfluence of cavity preparation and curing method on the marginal seal of resin composite restorations: an in vitro evaluation.en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofQuintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-34648831999-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.