You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69986
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPassos, Sheila Pestana-
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu-
dc.contributor.authorVanderlei, Aleska Dias-
dc.contributor.authorLeite, Fabiola Pessoa Pereira-
dc.contributor.authorKimpara, Estevão Tomomitsu-
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antonio-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:38Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:24:33Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:38Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:24:33Z-
dc.date.issued2007-11-16-
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/jad/abstract.php?article_id=8955#.U0QIX_ldV1Y-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 9, n. 5, p. 443-447, 2007.-
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69986-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/69986-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluated the effect of surface conditioning methods and thermocycling on the bond strength between a resin composite and an indirect composite system in order to test the repair bond strength. Materials and Methods: Eighteen blocks (5 x 5 x 4 mm) of indirect resin composite (Sinfony) were fabricated according to the manufacturer's instructions. The specimens were randomly assigned to one of the following two treatment conditions (9 blocks per treatment): (1) 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 90 s (Dentsply) + silanization, (2) silica coating with 30-Ìm SiOx particles (CoJet) + silanization. After surface conditioning, the bonding agent was applied (Adper Single Bond) and light polymerized. The composite resin (W3D Master) was condensed and polymerized incrementally to form a block. Following storage in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h, the indirect composite/resin blocks were sectioned in two axes (x and y) with a diamond disk under coolant irrigation to obtain nontrimmed specimens (sticks) with approximately 0.6 mm2 of bonding area. Twelve specimens were obtained per block (N = 216, n = 108 sticks). The specimens from each repaired block were again randomly divided into 2 groups and tested either after storage in water for 24 h or thermocycling (6000 cycles, 5°C to 55°C). The microtensile bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed: 1 mm/min). The mean bond strengths of the specimens of each block were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results: Both surface conditioning (p = 0.0001) and storage conditions (p = 0.0001) had a significant effect on the results. After 24 h water storage, silica coating and silanization (method 2) showed significantly higher bond strength results (46.4 ± 13.8 MPa) than that of hydrofluoric acid etching and silanization (method 1) (35.8 ± 9.7 MPa) (p < 0.001). After thermocycling, no significant difference was found between the mean bond strengths obtained with method 1 (34.1 ± 8.9 MPa) and method 2 (31.9 ± 7.9 MPa) (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Although after 24 h of testing, silica coating and silanization performed significantly better in resin-resin repair bond strength, both HF acid gel and silica coating followed by silanization revealed comparable bond strength results after thermocycling for 6000 times.en
dc.format.extent443-447-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectHydrofluoric acid-
dc.subjectIndirect composite-
dc.subjectMicrotensile test-
dc.subjectRepair-
dc.subjectSilica coating-
dc.subjecthydrofluoric acid-
dc.subjectresin-
dc.subjectsilane derivative-
dc.subjectsilicon dioxide-
dc.subjectanalysis of variance-
dc.subjectdental bonding-
dc.subjectdental care-
dc.subjectdental etching-
dc.subjectdrug storage-
dc.subjectmethodology-
dc.subjectrandomization-
dc.subjectsurface property-
dc.subjecttensile strength-
dc.subjecttooth prosthesis-
dc.subjectAnalysis of Variance-
dc.subjectComposite Resins-
dc.subjectDental Bonding-
dc.subjectDental Etching-
dc.subjectDental Prosthesis Repair-
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis-
dc.subjectDrug Storage-
dc.subjectHydrofluoric Acid-
dc.subjectRandom Allocation-
dc.subjectSilanes-
dc.subjectSilicon Dioxide-
dc.subjectSurface Properties-
dc.subjectTensile Strength-
dc.titleBond strength durability of direct and indirect composite systems following surface conditioning for repairen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Groningen-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University at São José Dos Campos-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Department of Dentistry and Dental Hygiene, Groningen-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Department of Dentistry and Dental Hygiene, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University at São José Dos Campos-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000250298900006-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesive Dentistry-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-36049023447-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.