You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70024
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPádua, M. S.-
dc.contributor.authorDeckmann, S. M.-
dc.contributor.authorSperandio, G. S.-
dc.contributor.authorMarafão, F. P.-
dc.contributor.authorColón, D.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:39Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:24:38Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:39Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:24:38Z-
dc.date.issued2007-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2007.4374728-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, p. 964-970.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70024-
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses the main characteristics and presents a comparative analysis of three synchronization algorithms based respectively, on a Phase-Locked Loop, a Kalman Filter and a Discrete Fourier Transform. It will be described the single and three-phase models of the first two methods and the single-phase model of the third one. Details on how to modify the filtering properties or dynamic response of each algorithm will be discussed in terms of their design parameters. In order to compare the different algorithms, these parameters will be set for maximum filter capability. Then, the dynamic response, during input amplitude and frequency deviations will be observed, as well as during the initialization procedure. So, advantages and disadvantages of all considered algorithms will be discussed. ©2007 IEEE.en
dc.format.extent964-970-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAlgorithms-
dc.subjectControl theory-
dc.subjectDiscrete Fourier transforms-
dc.subjectDynamic response-
dc.subjectElectronics industry-
dc.subjectFourier transforms-
dc.subjectFrequency response-
dc.subjectIndustrial electronics-
dc.subjectKalman filters-
dc.subjectMathematical transformations-
dc.subjectPhase locked loops-
dc.subjectTechnical presentations-
dc.subjectTelecommunication-
dc.subjectWave filters-
dc.subjectComparative analysis-
dc.subjectDesign parameters.-
dc.subjectFiltering properties-
dc.subjectFrequency deviations-
dc.subjectInternational symposium-
dc.subjectPhase modeling-
dc.subjectPhase-locked loop-
dc.subjectSingle-phase model-
dc.subjectSynchronization algorithms-
dc.subjectParameter estimation-
dc.titleComparative analysis of synchronization algorithms based on PLL, RDFT and Kalman Filteren
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP-
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Automation and Control Engineering Paulista State University, Sorocaba, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSchool of Automation and Control Engineering Paulista State University, Sorocaba, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ISIE.2007.4374728-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-50049112776-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.