You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70069
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Kélio Garcia-
dc.contributor.authorPedrini, Denise-
dc.contributor.authorDelbem, Alberto Carlos Botazzo-
dc.contributor.authorCannon, Mark-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:41Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:24:43Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:41Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:24:43Z-
dc.date.issued2007-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402007000400007-
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Dental Journal, v. 18, n. 4, p. 309-313, 2007.-
dc.identifier.issn0103-6440-
dc.identifier.issn1806-4760-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70069-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70069-
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the surface microhardness and fluoride release of 5 restorative materials - Ketac-Fil Plus, Vitremer, Fuji II LC, Freedom and Fluorofil - in two storage media: distilled/deionized water and a pH-cycling (pH 4.6). Twelve specimens of each material, were fabricated and the initial surface microhardness (ISM) was determined in a Shimadzu HMV-2000 microhardness tester (static load Knoop). The specimens were submitted to 6- or 18-h cycles in the tested media. The solutions were refreshed at the end of each cycle. All solutions were stored for further analysis. After 15-day storage, the final surface microhardness (FSM) and fluoride release were measured. Fluoride dose was measured with a fluoride-specific electrode (Orion 9609-BN) and digital ion analyzer (Orion 720 A). The variables ISM, FSM and fluoride release were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance and Tukey's test (p<0.05). There was significant difference in FSM between the storage media for Vitremer (pH 4.6 = 40.2 ± 1.5; water = 42.6 ± 1.4), Ketac-Fil Plus (pH 4.6 = 73.4 ± 2.7; water = 58.2 ± 1.3) and Fluorofil (pH 4.6 = 44.3 ± 1.8; water = 38.4 ± 1.0). Ketac-Fil Plus (9.9 ± 18.0) and Fluorofil (4.4 ± 1.3) presented higher fluoride release in water, whereas Vitremer (7.4 ± 7.1), Fuji II LC (5.7 ± 4.7) and Freedom (2.1 ± 1.7) had higher fluoride release at pH 4.6. Microhardness and fluoride release of the tested restorative materials varied according to the storage medium.en
dc.format.extent309-313-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectDental material-
dc.subjectFluoride-
dc.subjectHardness-
dc.subjectIn vitro-
dc.subjectpH-cycling-
dc.subjectacetic acid derivative-
dc.subjectanticaries agent-
dc.subjectbiomedical and dental materials-
dc.subjectbuffer-
dc.subjectcalcium-
dc.subjectcompomer-
dc.subjectfluoride-
dc.subjectFreedom Compomer-
dc.subjectFuji II LC cement-
dc.subjectglass ionomer-
dc.subjectKetac Fil-
dc.subjectKetac-Fil-
dc.subjectmaleic acid derivative-
dc.subjectphosphorus-
dc.subjectresin-
dc.subjecttrometamol-
dc.subjectunclassified drug-
dc.subjectVitremer-
dc.subjectwater-
dc.subjectchemistry-
dc.subjectdiffusion-
dc.subjecthardness-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjection selective electrode-
dc.subjectmaterials testing-
dc.subjectpH-
dc.subjectsurface property-
dc.subjectAcetates-
dc.subjectBuffers-
dc.subjectCalcium-
dc.subjectCariostatic Agents-
dc.subjectCompomers-
dc.subjectComposite Resins-
dc.subjectDental Materials-
dc.subjectDiffusion-
dc.subjectFluorides-
dc.subjectGlass Ionomer Cements-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectHydrogen-Ion Concentration-
dc.subjectIon-Selective Electrodes-
dc.subjectMaleates-
dc.subjectMaterials Testing-
dc.subjectPhosphorus-
dc.subjectResins, Synthetic-
dc.subjectSurface Properties-
dc.subjectTromethamine-
dc.subjectWater-
dc.titleMicrohardness and fluoride release of restorative materials in different storage mediaen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionNorthwestern University (NU)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pediatric and Social Dentistry São Paulo State University School of Dentistry of Araçatuba, Araçatuba, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Surgery and Integrated Clinic São Paulo State University School of Dentistry of Araçatuba, Araçatuba, SP-
dc.description.affiliationChildrens' Memorial Hospital Northwestern University, Chicago-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Pediatric and Social Dentistry São Paulo State University School of Dentistry of Araçatuba, Araçatuba, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Surgery and Integrated Clinic São Paulo State University School of Dentistry of Araçatuba, Araçatuba, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S0103-64402007000400007-
dc.identifier.scieloS0103-64402007000400007-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-50049098768.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Dental Journal-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-50049098768-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8159-4853pt
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.