You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70171
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorValandro, Luiz Felipe-
dc.contributor.authorPelogia, Fernanda-
dc.contributor.authorGalhano, Graziela-
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorMallmann, Andre-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:44Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:24:57Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:44Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:24:57Z-
dc.date.issued2007-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/jad/abstract.php?article_id=8961#.U0QIfPldV1Y-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 9, n. 6, p. 495-498, 2007.-
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70171-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70171-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess the effect of the composite surface conditioning on the microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to a composite used for inlay/onlay restorations. Materials and Methods: Forty-two blocks (6 × 6 × 4 mm) of a microfilled composite (Vita VMLC) were produced and divided into 3 groups (N = 14) by composite surface conditioning methods: Gr1 - etching with 37% phosphoric acid, washing, drying, silanization; Gr2 - air abrasion with 50-l̀m Al2O3 particles, silanization; Gr3 - chairside tribochemical silica coating (CoJet System), silanization. Single-Bond (one-step adhesive) was applied on the conditioned surfaces and the two resin blocks treated with the same method were cemented using RelyX ARC (dual-curing resin cement). The specimens were stored for 7 days in water at 37°C and then sectioned to produce nontrimmed beam samples, which were submitted to microtensile bond strength testing (μTBS). For statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test, · = 0.05), the means of the beam samples from each luted specimen were calculated (n = 7). Results: μTBS values (MPa) of Gr2 (62.0 ± 3.9a) and Gr3 (60.5 ± 7.9a) were statistically similar to each other and higher than Gr1 (38.2 ± 8.9b). The analysis of the fractured surfaces revealed that all failures occurred at the adhesive zone. Conclusion: Conditioning methods with 50-l̀m Al2O3 or tribochemical silica coating allowed bonding between resin and composite that was statistically similar and stronger than conditioning with acid etching.en
dc.format.extent495-498-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectComposite-
dc.subjectInlay-
dc.subjectMicrotensile bond strength-
dc.subjectSurface conditioning-
dc.subjectTribochemical silica coating-
dc.subjectaluminum oxide-
dc.subjectbisphenol A bis(2 hydroxypropyl) ether dimethacrylate-
dc.subjectdentin bonding agent-
dc.subjectESPE bonding system-
dc.subjectmacrogol derivative-
dc.subjectphosphoric acid-
dc.subjectpolymethacrylic acid derivative-
dc.subjectRelyX ARC-
dc.subjectresin-
dc.subjectresin cement-
dc.subjectsilane derivative-
dc.subjectsilicon dioxide-
dc.subjectsingle bond-
dc.subjectunclassified drug-
dc.subjectwater-
dc.subjectadhesion-
dc.subjectchemistry-
dc.subjectdental acid etching-
dc.subjectdental bonding-
dc.subjectdental etching-
dc.subjectdental surgery-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectmaterials testing-
dc.subjectmechanical stress-
dc.subjectsurface property-
dc.subjecttemperature-
dc.subjecttensile strength-
dc.subjectAcid Etching, Dental-
dc.subjectAdhesiveness-
dc.subjectAluminum Oxide-
dc.subjectBisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate-
dc.subjectComposite Resins-
dc.subjectDental Bonding-
dc.subjectDental Etching-
dc.subjectDentin-Bonding Agents-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectInlays-
dc.subjectMaterials Testing-
dc.subjectPhosphoric Acids-
dc.subjectPolyethylene Glycols-
dc.subjectPolymethacrylic Acids-
dc.subjectResin Cements-
dc.subjectSilanes-
dc.subjectSilicon Dioxide-
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical-
dc.subjectSurface Properties-
dc.subjectTemperature-
dc.subjectTensile Strength-
dc.subjectWater-
dc.titleSurface conditioning of a composite used for inlay/onlay restorations: Effect on μTBS to resin cementen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Santa Maria-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionFoundation for Science Development-
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Dentistry-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria-
dc.description.affiliationSão Jose dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Jose Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos-
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Dentistry Foundation for Science Development, Salvador-
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Santa Maria School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry, Rua Marechal Floriano, 1184, 97015-372, Santa Maria-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Jose dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Jose Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesive Dentistry-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-37549031293-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.