You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70231
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Edemo João-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:45Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:25:05Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:25:05Z-
dc.date.issued2008-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://200.145.140.50/ojs1/viewarticle.php?id=279&layout=abstract-
dc.identifier.citationIrriga, v. 13, n. 1, p. 36-46, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn1413-7895-
dc.identifier.issn1808-3765-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70231-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70231-
dc.description.abstractAn experiment with four treatments was carried out on the experimental area of ADEI to compare three methods of water use requirement: ETc (T1) - irrigation based on crop evapotranspiration (ETc); Tensiometers (T2 and T3) - irrigations were made through reading of tensiometers installed at 40 cm deep and, Control (T4) - only one irrigation to promote the seedlings emergence. Both Class A pan and soil water depletion methods presented good results when the crop was developed without restraint of water. The Katerji method can be utilized in conditions of water restriction. Irrigation frequency was more important than amount of applied water for higher yield.en
dc.format.extent36-46-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectClass A pan-
dc.subjectKaterji method-
dc.subjectTensiometer-
dc.subjectWater depletion-
dc.subjectCrops-
dc.subjectEvapotranspiration-
dc.subjectIrrigation-
dc.subjectSeed-
dc.subjectWater management-
dc.subjectcomparative study-
dc.subjectcrop yield-
dc.subjectestimation method-
dc.subjectevapotranspiration-
dc.subjectexperimental study-
dc.subjectirrigation-
dc.subjectseedling emergence-
dc.subjectsoil water-
dc.subjecttensiometer-
dc.subjectwater supply-
dc.subjectwater use-
dc.titleComparação entre trȩs métodos para estimar lâminas de irrigaçãopt
dc.title.alternativeComparision among three methods to estimate irrigation water requirementen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Engenharia Rural Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Engenharia Rural Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-43549117737.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofIrriga-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-43549117737-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.