You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70296
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPero, Ana Carolina-
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Débora Barros-
dc.contributor.authorMarra, Juliê-
dc.contributor.authorRuvolo-Filho, Adhemar Colla-
dc.contributor.authorCompagnoni, Marco Antonio-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:48Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:25:12Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:48Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:25:12Z-
dc.date.issued2008-02-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00264.x-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics, v. 17, n. 2, p. 125-129, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X-
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70296-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70296-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluated the influence of polymerization cycle and thickness of maxillary complete denture bases on the porosity of acrylic resin. Materials and Methods: Two heat-activated denture base resins - one conventional (Clássico) and one designed for microwave polymerization (Onda-Cryl) - were used. Four groups were established, according to polymerization cycles: A (Onda-Cryl, short microwave cycle), B (Onda-Cryl, long microwave cycle), C (Onda-Cryl, manufacturing microwave cycle), and T (Clássico, water bath). Porosity was evaluated for different thicknesses (2.0, 3.5, and 5.0 mm; thicknesses I, II, and III, respectively) by measurement of the specimen volume before and after its immersion in water. The percent porosity data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis for comparison among the groups. Results: The Kruskal-Wallis test detected that the combinations of the different cycles and thicknesses showed significant differences, and the mean ranks of percent porosity showed differences only in the thinnest (2.0 mm) microwave-polymerized specimens (A = 53.55, B = 40.80, and C = 90.70). Thickness did not affect the results for cycle T (I = 96.15, II = 70.20, and III = 82.70), because porosity values were similar in the three thicknesses. Conclusions: Microwave polymerization cycles and the specimen thickness of acrylic resin influenced porosity. Porosity differences were not observed in the polymerized resin bases in the water bath cycle for any thickness. © 2007 by The American College of Prosthodontists.en
dc.format.extent125-129-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAcrylic resin-
dc.subjectComplete denture-
dc.subjectPolymerization method-
dc.subjectPorosity-
dc.subjectacrylic acid resin-
dc.subjectbiomedical and dental materials-
dc.subjectpoly(methyl methacrylate)-
dc.subjectpolymer-
dc.subjectwater-
dc.subjectabsorption-
dc.subjectchemistry-
dc.subjectcomparative study-
dc.subjectdenture-
dc.subjectheat-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectmaterials testing-
dc.subjectmicrowave radiation-
dc.subjectporosity-
dc.subjectpressure-
dc.subjectradiation exposure-
dc.subjectsurface property-
dc.subjecttemperature-
dc.subjecttime-
dc.subjectAbsorption-
dc.subjectAcrylic Resins-
dc.subjectDental Materials-
dc.subjectDenture Bases-
dc.subjectDenture, Complete, Upper-
dc.subjectHeat-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectMaterials Testing-
dc.subjectMicrowaves-
dc.subjectPolymers-
dc.subjectPolymethyl Methacrylate-
dc.subjectPressure-
dc.subjectSurface Properties-
dc.subjectTemperature-
dc.subjectTime Factors-
dc.subjectWater-
dc.titleInfluence of microwave polymerization method and thickness on porosity of acrylic resinen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Chemistry São Carlos Federal University, São Carlos-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University, Rua Humaitá 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo, 14801-903-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University, Rua Humaitá 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo, 14801-903-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00264.x-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-38749087965-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.