You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70406
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLombardo, Geraldo H. L.-
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Rodrigo O. A.-
dc.contributor.authorMichida, Silvia M. A.-
dc.contributor.authorDe Melo, Renata Marques-
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorValandro, Luiz Felipe-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:23:32Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:25:28Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:23:32Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:25:28Z-
dc.date.issued2008-05-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18473025-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Contemporary Dental Practice, v. 9, n. 4, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn1526-3711-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70406-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70406-
dc.description.abstractAim: Based on the hypothesis the application of a low-viscosity hydrophobic resin coating improves the bond of all-in-one adhesive, the purpose of the study was to evaluate the bond strength of four adhesive systems to bovine root dentin using the push-out test method. Methods and Materials: The root canals of 32 bovine roots (16 mm) were prepared to a length of 12 mm using a FRC Postec Plus preparation drill. The specimens were allocated into four groups according to the adhesive system used: (Group 1) All-in-one Xeno III; (Group 2) All-in-one Xeno III+ScotchBond Multi-Purpose Plus Adhesive; (Group 3) Simplified Etch & Rinse One Step Plus; and (Group 4) Multi-Bottle Etch & Rinse All-Bond 2. A fiber-reinforced composite retention post was reproduced using an additional silicon impression and fabricated with DuoLink resin cement. The root specimens were treated with the selected adhesive systems, and the resin posts were luted in the canals with DuoLink resin cement. Each root specimen was cross sectioned into four samples (±1.8 mm in thickness), and the post sections were pushed-out to determine the bond strength to dentin. Results: Group 2 (2.9±1.2) was statistically higher than Group 1 (1.1±0.5) and Group 3 (1.1±0.5). Groups 1 and 3 showed no statistically significant difference while Group 4 (2.0±0.7) presented similar values (p>0.05) to Groups 1, 2, and 3 [(one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)] and Tukey test, α=0.05). Conclusion: The hypothesis was accepted since the application of the additional layer of a low-viscosity bonding resin improved the bond of the all-in-one adhesive. Further studies must be conducted to evaluate the long-term bond.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAdhesive systems-
dc.subjectBond strength-
dc.subjectPush-out test-
dc.subjectRoot dentin-
dc.subjectSimplified adhesive-
dc.subjectAll Bond 2-
dc.subjectAll-Bond 2-
dc.subjectdentin bonding agent-
dc.subjectDuo Link-
dc.subjectDuo-Link-
dc.subjectmethacrylic acid derivative-
dc.subjectONE STEP PLUS-
dc.subjectONE-STEP PLUS-
dc.subjectresin-
dc.subjectresin cement-
dc.subjectScotchbond Multi Purpose Plus-
dc.subjectScotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus-
dc.subjectXeno III-
dc.subjectadhesion-
dc.subjectanimal-
dc.subjectcattle-
dc.subjectchemistry-
dc.subjectdental acid etching-
dc.subjectdental bonding-
dc.subjectdentin-
dc.subjectendodontics-
dc.subjecthydrophobicity-
dc.subjectinstrumentation-
dc.subjectmaterials testing-
dc.subjectmechanical stress-
dc.subjectmethodology-
dc.subjecttooth crown-
dc.subjecttooth pulp-
dc.subjectultrastructure-
dc.subjectAcid Etching, Dental-
dc.subjectAdhesiveness-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectCattle-
dc.subjectComposite Resins-
dc.subjectDental Bonding-
dc.subjectDental Pulp Cavity-
dc.subjectDentin-
dc.subjectDentin-Bonding Agents-
dc.subjectHydrophobicity-
dc.subjectMaterials Testing-
dc.subjectMethacrylates-
dc.subjectPost and Core Technique-
dc.subjectResin Cements-
dc.subjectRoot Canal Preparation-
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical-
dc.titleResin bonding to root canal dentin: Effect of the application of an experimental hydrophobic resin coating after an all-in-one adhesiveen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Santa Maria-
dc.description.affiliationSão Jose Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, Sao Jose dos Campos, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Jose Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, Sao Jose dos Campos, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Jose Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, Sao Jose dos Campos, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Jose Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, Sao Jose dos Campos, SP-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Contemporary Dental Practice-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-43449095447-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.