You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70445
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTurco, José Eduardo Pitelli-
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, José Carlos-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:23:34Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:25:39Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:23:34Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:25:39Z-
dc.date.issued2008-07-01-
dc.identifierhttp://200.145.140.50/ojs1/viewarticle.php?id=344&layout=abstract-
dc.identifier.citationIrriga, v. 13, n. 3, p. 339-354, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn1413-7895-
dc.identifier.issn1808-3765-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70445-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70445-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to evaluate and compare measurements and estimates from Davis and Campbell Scientific Instruments in two automatic weather stations. Integrity of meteorological data for estimates of evapotranspiration of reference crop (ETo) from both stations was also evaluated. The following meteorological data were evaluated: air temperature, air humidity, wind speed, precipitation, net radiation and global solar radiation. The Penman-Monteith reference method to estimate ETo was evaluated daily. The weather stations were set up in an experimental area of the Rural Engineering Department-FACV/ UNESP, in Jaboticabal, State of Sao Paulo. Data were collected daily and statistical analysis was performed using linear regression analysis. The integrity of meteorological data to estimate ETo was evaluated. The results of the study in the stations using linear regression analysis showed that daily estimates for ETo had acceptable differences. The technique which evaluates the integrity of meteorological data revealed that data of relative humidity from both stations and of precipitation using Campbell Instruments were not good.en
dc.format.extent339-354-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAutomatic weather station-
dc.subjectEvapotranspiration-
dc.subjectIntercomparison-
dc.subjectAtmospheric humidity-
dc.subjectAtmospheric radiation-
dc.subjectAtmospheric temperature-
dc.subjectPrecipitation (meteorology)-
dc.subjectSolar radiation-
dc.subjectWind-
dc.subjectair temperature-
dc.subjectcrop-
dc.subjectestimation method-
dc.subjectevapotranspiration-
dc.subjectprecipitation (climatology)-
dc.subjectregression analysis-
dc.subjectrelative humidity-
dc.subjectsolar radiation-
dc.subjectwind velocity-
dc.titleAvaliação de duas estações meteorológicas automatizadas, para estimativa diária da evapotranspiração de referência obtida pelo método de penman-monteithpt
dc.title.alternativeTwo automatic weather stations meteorological data evaluation by penman-monteith reference evaporation methoden
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Engenharia Rural Faculdade de Ciências Agrária e Veterinária Universidade Estadual Paulista, Câmpus de Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Ciências Exatas Faculdade de Ciências Agrária e Veterinária Universidade - Estadual Paulista, Câmpus de Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Engenharia Rural Faculdade de Ciências Agrária e Veterinária Universidade Estadual Paulista, Câmpus de Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, SP-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-57049119520.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofIrriga-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-57049119520-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.