You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70684
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves-
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Alessandra-
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Erica Alves-
dc.contributor.authorTabata, Lucas Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Paulo Henrique dos-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:23:43Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:26:16Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:23:43Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:26:16Z-
dc.date.issued2008-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00308.x-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics, v. 17, n. 8, p. 641-647, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X-
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70684-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70684-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluated the influence of surface abrasion of transfer copings to obtain a precise master cast for a partially edentulous restoration with different inclinations. Materials and Methods: Replicas (N = 30) of a metal matrix (control group) containing two implants at 90° and 65° in relation to the benchtop were obtained using a polyether impression material and three impression techniques: square impression copings splint with dental floss and autopolymerizing acrylic resin (TRS), square impression copings abraded with aluminum oxide (TA), and square impression copings abraded with aluminum oxide and adhesive-coated (TAA). The replicas obtained in type V stone were digitalized, and the images were exported to AutoCAD software to perform the readings of possible degree alterations in implant inclinations. The results were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test (α < 0.05). Results: Comparing the techniques with regard to the 90° implant inclination, no statistical difference was observed between the three techniques and the control group. Analyzing the three techniques with regard to the 65° implant inclination, no significant difference was seen between technique TA and the control group. Conclusions: Technique TA presented more accurate master casts than TRS and TAA techniques. The angulated implant (65°) tended to generate more imprecise master casts than implants perpendicular to the surface. © 2008 by The American College of Prosthodontists.en
dc.format.extent641-647-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectDental implants-
dc.subjectDental impression materials-
dc.subjectDental impression techniques-
dc.subjectProsthodontics-
dc.subjectacrylic acid resin-
dc.subjectadhesive agent-
dc.subjectaluminum oxide-
dc.subjectbiomedical and dental materials-
dc.subjectcalcium sulfate-
dc.subjectresin-
dc.subjectchemistry-
dc.subjectcomparative study-
dc.subjectcomputer program-
dc.subjectdental etching-
dc.subjectdental impression-
dc.subjectdenture-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectimage processing-
dc.subjectimpregum-
dc.subjectmaterials testing-
dc.subjectstatistics-
dc.subjectsurface property-
dc.subjecttooth implantation-
dc.subjecttooth prosthesis-
dc.subjectAcrylic Resins-
dc.subjectAdhesives-
dc.subjectAluminum Oxide-
dc.subjectCalcium Sulfate-
dc.subjectDental Abutments-
dc.subjectDental Etching-
dc.subjectDental Implants-
dc.subjectDental Impression Materials-
dc.subjectDental Impression Technique-
dc.subjectDental Materials-
dc.subjectDental Prosthesis Design-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectImage Processing, Computer-Assisted-
dc.subjectMaterials Testing-
dc.subjectResins, Synthetic-
dc.subjectSoftware-
dc.subjectSurface Properties-
dc.titleAccuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1 - Influence of transfer copings surface abrasionen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionDental Practice-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics School of Dentistry at Araçatuba São Paulo State University-
dc.description.affiliationDental Practice, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics School of Dentistry at Araçatuba Sao Paulo State University, Jose Bonifacio Str. 1193, Araçatuba Sao Paulo 16015-050-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics School of Dentistry at Araçatuba São Paulo State University-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics School of Dentistry at Araçatuba Sao Paulo State University, Jose Bonifacio Str. 1193, Araçatuba Sao Paulo 16015-050-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00308.x-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-57349162098-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.