You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70754
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLino, Isabels Coutinho-
dc.contributor.authorPerinotto, José Alexandre de Jesus-
dc.contributor.authorDa Silva Cerri, Leandro Eugenio-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:23:45Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:26:26Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:23:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:26:26Z-
dc.date.issued2008-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://geociencias.no-ip.org/27_1/Art%205_Lino.pdf-
dc.identifierhttp://www.periodicos.rc.biblioteca.unesp.br/index.php/geociencias/article/view/2274-
dc.identifier.citationGeociencias, v. 27, n. 1, p. 53-62, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn0101-9082-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70754-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70754-
dc.description.abstractHistorically, the incorrect waste disposal has been related to epidemics which resulted in thousand of deaths. Despite the efforts to develop sanitary disposal methods in the 19 century, even today, uncontrolled dumps are often found in undeveloped countries. These places are responsible for environment pollution and for several diseases. The process of adequate waste disposal begins with the selection of suitable landfill areas, based on environmental characteristics. The goal of this research was to compare two methods of landfill site selection: the first one developed by IG-SMA (1999), and the other by Basílio (2001). Both methods were developed and applied in the same area - region of Campinas, São Paulo State, Brazil and this fact explains the choice for them; the comparison was made by superposing maps. Despite the same geographic area, the result was very different and few areas in common were found; IG-SMA (1999) obtained more suitable areas than Basílio (2001). This has been attributed to scale, criteria and attribute differences and, as a conclusion, Basílio (2001) was considered more restrictive than IG-SMA (1999).en
dc.format.extent53-62-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectLandfill-
dc.subjectMunicipal solid waste-
dc.subjectSite selection-
dc.subjectcomparative study-
dc.subjectdeveloping world-
dc.subjectlandfill-
dc.subjectnineteenth century-
dc.subjectsite selection-
dc.subjectwaste disposal-
dc.subjectBrazil-
dc.subjectCampinas-
dc.subjectSao Paulo [Brazil]-
dc.subjectSouth America-
dc.titleImplantação de aterros sanitários: Comparação de métodos de seleção de áreaspt
dc.title.alternativeLandfill site selection: Comparison of methodsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista Campus de Rio Claro, Avenida 24-A, 1515 - Bela Vista, CEP 13506-900. Rio Claro, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Geologia Aplicada Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista, Avenida 24-A, 1515 - Bela Vista, CEP 13506-900. Rio Claro, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista Campus de Rio Claro, Avenida 24-A, 1515 - Bela Vista, CEP 13506-900. Rio Claro, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Geologia Aplicada Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista, Avenida 24-A, 1515 - Bela Vista, CEP 13506-900. Rio Claro, SP-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-59349099467.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofGeociências-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-59349099467-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.