You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70927
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAccorinte, M. L. R.-
dc.contributor.authorLoguercio, A. D.-
dc.contributor.authorReis, A.-
dc.contributor.authorBauer, J. R. O.-
dc.contributor.authorGrande, R. H. M.-
dc.contributor.authorMurata, S. S.-
dc.contributor.authorSouza, V.-
dc.contributor.authorHolland, R.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:23:52Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:26:51Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:23:52Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:26:51Z-
dc.date.issued2009-02-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01485.x-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Endodontic Journal, v. 42, n. 2, p. 122-128, 2009.-
dc.identifier.issn0143-2885-
dc.identifier.issn1365-2591-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70927-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70927-
dc.description.abstractAim: The present randomized, controlled prospective study evaluated the histomorphological response of human dental pulps capped with two grey mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) compounds. Methodology: Pulp exposures were performed on the occlusal floor of 40 human permanent pre-molars. The pulp was capped either with ProRoot (Dentsply) or MTA-Angelus (Angelus) and restored with zinc oxide eugenol cement. After 30 and 60 days, teeth were extracted and processed for histological examination and the effects on the pulp were scored. The data were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis and Conover tests (α = 0.05). Results: In five out of the 40 teeth bacteria were present in pulp tissue. No significant difference was observed between the two materials (P > 0.05) in terms of overall histological features (hard tissue bridge, inflammatory response, giant cells and particles of capping materials). Overall, 94% and 88% of the specimens capped with MTA-Angelus and ProRoot, respectively, showed either total or partial hard tissue bridge formation (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Both commercial materials ProRoot (Dentsply) and MTA-Angelus (Angelus) produced similar responses in the pulp when used for pulp capping in intact, caries-free teeth. © 2009 International Endodontic Journal.en
dc.format.extent122-128-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectHard tissue bridge-
dc.subjectInflammatory response-
dc.subjectMineral trioxide aggregate-
dc.subjectPulp-capping human teeth-
dc.subjectaluminum derivative-
dc.subjectcalcium derivative-
dc.subjectmineral trioxide aggregate-
dc.subjectoxide-
dc.subjectsilicate-
dc.subjecttooth cement-
dc.subjectzinc oxide eugenol-
dc.subjectadult-
dc.subjectclinical trial-
dc.subjectcomparative study-
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trial-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectdentin sensitivity-
dc.subjectdrug combination-
dc.subjectdrug effect-
dc.subjectendodontics-
dc.subjectfollow up-
dc.subjectgiant cell-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectmicrobiology-
dc.subjectodontoblast-
dc.subjectpathology-
dc.subjectprospective study-
dc.subjectpulpitis-
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial-
dc.subjectsingle blind procedure-
dc.subjecttooth pulp-
dc.subjecttooth pulp disease-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectAluminum Compounds-
dc.subjectCalcium Compounds-
dc.subjectDental Cements-
dc.subjectDental Pulp-
dc.subjectDental Pulp Capping-
dc.subjectDental Pulp Exposure-
dc.subjectDental Pulp Necrosis-
dc.subjectDentin Sensitivity-
dc.subjectDentin, Secondary-
dc.subjectDrug Combinations-
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subjectGiant Cells-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectOdontoblasts-
dc.subjectOxides-
dc.subjectProspective Studies-
dc.subjectPulpitis-
dc.subjectSilicates-
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Method-
dc.subjectZinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement-
dc.titleEvaluation of two mineral trioxide aggregate compounds as pulp-capping agents in human teethen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Braz Cubas (UBC)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNIOESC)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Bandairantes de São Paulo (UNIBAN)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials School of Dentistry University Brás Cubas, São Paulo, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDental Materials and Operative Dentistry School of Dentistry University of Oeste de Santa Catarina, Joaçaba, SC-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, PR-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials School of Dentistry University Bandairantes, Sâo Paulo, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials School of Dentistry University of São Paulo, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Endodontics School of Dentistry University of Estado de São Paulo, Araçatuba, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa-Mestrado em Odontologia, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M, Sala 64A-Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Paraná 84030 900-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01485.x-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Endodontic Journal-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-58149327293-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.