You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70992
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRozane, Danilo E.-
dc.contributor.authorNatale, William-
dc.contributor.authorPrado, Renato de M.-
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, José C.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:23:54Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:26:59Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:23:54Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:26:59Z-
dc.date.issued2009-05-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662009000300003-
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v. 13, n. 3, p. 233-239, 2009.-
dc.identifier.issn1415-4366-
dc.identifier.issn1807-1929-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70992-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/70992-
dc.description.abstractThe ideal size precision of the foliar sample determines manual work optimization, and also diminishes inherent errors in diagnosis reports of nutritional state. This work aimed to determine the size of the foliar samples and the sample error variation in guava plantations submitted to two hydric cultivations for the nutritional state diagnosis of this fruit. The work included two studies, both under an entirely randomized experimental design. Study 1 was carried out in an orchard under unirrigated cultivation with four treatments and six repetitions that consisted of leaf collection in 5, 10, 20 and 40 plants. Study 2 was carried out in an orchard under irrigated cultivation with five treatments and 10 repetitions that consisted of leaf collection in 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 guava plants. It was concluded that in unirrigated orchards it is necessary to sample leaves in 40 plants in order to keep the macronutrients sample error between 5 to 10%. For the micronutrients, on the other hand, at least 40 plants were necessary and, if Fe and Zn were considered, the sample must be even larger. In irrigated orchards, leaves deriving from 10 plants were enough to keep the sample error between 5 to 10%. However, considering the micronutrients, it was necessary to sample 20 guava plants.en
dc.format.extent233-239-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectExperiment-
dc.subjectFoliar diagnosis-
dc.subjectPlant nutrition-
dc.subjectPsidium guajava-
dc.subjectSample-
dc.subjectPsidium-
dc.titleTamanho da amostra foliar para avaliação do estado nutricional de goiabeiras com e sem irrigaçãopt
dc.title.alternativeIdeal size of leaf sample for nutritional state evaluation of guava under irrigated and unirrigated cultivationen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationFCAV/UNESP Departamento de Solos e Adubos, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo D. Castellane, s/no, CEP 14870-000, Jaboticabal, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespFCAV/UNESP Departamento de Solos e Adubos, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo D. Castellane, s/no, CEP 14870-000, Jaboticabal, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1415-43662009000300003-
dc.identifier.scieloS1415-43662009000300003-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-67650603398.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-67650603398-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.