You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71224
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVitorasso, Guilherme-
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Danilo Florentino-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:02Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:27:36Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:02Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:27:36Z-
dc.date.issued2009-11-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662009000600018-
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v. 13, n. 6, p. 788-794, 2009.-
dc.identifier.issn1415-4366-
dc.identifier.issn1807-1929-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71224-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71224-
dc.description.abstractPoulty house typology and the materials used (mainly for roofing) are the determining factors for an appropriate thermal condition aiming at production. In this context, the main point of this paper was to identify differences in the internal environment of two poultry houses, using monitoring and afterwards using statistics for comparing the environmental variables. The data analyzed did not show evidence of better thermal comfort for the house which was covered with ceramic roofing tile, because this house did not have ridged vents, making the hot air exit from the house difficult by the chimney effect. The ammonia concentration measured inside both houses was within the comfort limit. The temperature and humidity index of the house covered with ceramic roofing tiles was higher than the house which was covered with cement asbestos roofing tile, even though lower temperature on the tiles' surfaces was verified, showing the positive effects of the use of ridge vents at the housing. Based on the results obtained it is recommended for the Bastos, SP region, that poulty houses should be built with the ridge vent and long eaves beyond the roof of ceramic tiles.en
dc.format.extent788-794-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAnimal environment-
dc.subjectRoof types-
dc.subjectThermal comfort-
dc.subjectAnimalia-
dc.titleAnálise comparativa do ambiente de aviários de postura com diferentes sistemas de acondicionamentopt
dc.title.alternativeComparative analysis of the environment of poultry sheds with different systems of acclimatizationen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Av. Domingos da Costa Lopes, 780, CEP 17603-630, Tupã, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Av. Domingos da Costa Lopes, 780, CEP 17603-630, Tupã, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1415-43662009000600018-
dc.identifier.scieloS1415-43662009000600018-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-70350707715.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-70350707715-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.