You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71270
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPaiva, Carlos Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorPaiva, Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro-
dc.contributor.authorGarita, Rodrigo-
dc.contributor.authorMichelin, Odair Carlito-
dc.contributor.authorOkoshi, Katashi-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:03Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:27:42Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:03Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:27:42Z-
dc.date.issued2009-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12029-009-9101-z-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, v. 40, n. 3-4, p. 133-137, 2009.-
dc.identifier.issn1941-6628-
dc.identifier.issn1941-6636-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71270-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71270-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered to be the backbone of colorectal cancer (CRC) systemic therapy since the great majority of recommended regimens include its administration. A clinical picture consisting of chest pain, sometimes cardiac enzyme elevation, electrocardiogram abnormalities consistent with myocardial ischemia, and normal coronary angiogram associated with 5-FU administration have been infrequently reported. The clinical dilemma is: Which chemotherapy regimen should we use in CRC patients with a previous acute coronary syndrome (ACS) associated with 5-FU? Case Report: We describe the case of a 55-year-old otherwise healthy woman with metastatic colon adenocarcinoma who presented an ACS probably secondary to arterial vasospasm while receiving continuous intravenous 5-FU infusion (mFOLFOX6 regimen). After the ACS, the patient was treated with raltitrexate plus oxaliplatin (TOMOX) and subsequently with irinotecan plus cetuximab with no other cardiac event. Conclusion: The risk of cardiotoxicity associated with 5-FU is low but real. The probable mechanism is arterial vasospasm, as suggested by our case report. Both the use of the TOMOX regimen and irinotecan plus cetuximab seems to be safe regimens to be considered in this clinical scenario. © 2009 Humana Press Inc.en
dc.format.extent133-137-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subject5-fluorouracil-
dc.subjectAdverse effects-
dc.subjectCardiotoxicity-
dc.subjectColonic neoplasms-
dc.subjectacetylsalicylic acid-
dc.subjectbeta adrenergic receptor blocking agent-
dc.subjectcetuximab-
dc.subjectclopidogrel-
dc.subjectfluorouracil-
dc.subjectfolinic acid-
dc.subjectglyceryl trinitrate-
dc.subjectirinotecan-
dc.subjectisosorbide dinitrate-
dc.subjectoxaliplatin-
dc.subjectraltitrexed-
dc.subjectacute coronary syndrome-
dc.subjectadult-
dc.subjectanemia-
dc.subjectburning sensation-
dc.subjectcancer combination chemotherapy-
dc.subjectcancer palliative therapy-
dc.subjectcase report-
dc.subjectcolon adenocarcinoma-
dc.subjectcolon obstruction-
dc.subjectcontinuous infusion-
dc.subjectcoronary artery spasm-
dc.subjectdrug safety-
dc.subjectdrug withdrawal-
dc.subjectECG abnormality-
dc.subjectfemale-
dc.subjecthemicolectomy-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectliver metastasis-
dc.subjectlymph node metastasis-
dc.subjectmultiple cycle treatment-
dc.subjectpriority journal-
dc.subjectretrosternal pain-
dc.subjectsigmoid-
dc.subjectST segment depression-
dc.subjectST segment elevation-
dc.subjecttreatment outcome-
dc.subjectAcute Coronary Syndrome-
dc.subjectAdenocarcinoma-
dc.subjectAntibodies, Monoclonal-
dc.subjectAntimetabolites, Antineoplastic-
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols-
dc.subjectCamptothecin-
dc.subjectColorectal Neoplasms-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectFluorouracil-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectInfusions, Intravenous-
dc.subjectLeucovorin-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectOrganoplatinum Compounds-
dc.subjectQuinazolines-
dc.subjectThiophenes-
dc.titleAcute coronary syndrome associated with continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer-a case report with a discussion on this clinical dilemmaen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationOncological and Hemato-Oncological Center São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Nursing São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Surgery São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Clinics São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliation, Praça Isabel Arruda 138, Centro, Botucatu, SP 18602-111-
dc.description.affiliationUnespOncological and Hemato-Oncological Center São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Nursing São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Surgery São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Clinics São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12029-009-9101-z-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Gastrointestinal Cancer-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-73549113781-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.