You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71370
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPedrini, Denise-
dc.contributor.authorSonoda, Celso Koogi-
dc.contributor.authorPoi, Wilson Roberto-
dc.contributor.authorBarioni, Sônia Regina Panzarini-
dc.contributor.authorCastro, José Carlos M.-
dc.contributor.authorBrandini, Daniela Atili-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:31Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:27:55Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:27:55Z-
dc.date.issued2009-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4034/1519.0501.2009.0092.0013-
dc.identifier.citationPesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada, v. 9, n. 2, p. 211-215, 2009.-
dc.identifier.issn1519-0501-
dc.identifier.issn1983-4632-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71370-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71370-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To analyze the reasons for replacing amalgam and composite resin restorations of patients treated at the Integrated Clinic Discipline of the Dental School of Araçatuba (UNESP), SP, Brazil. Method: After examining the patients for data collection to obtain a diagnosis, the treatment plan was outlined using a clinical form containing the restorations to be replaced, the reasons for replacing, the restorative material of choice and the number of restored surfaces. Next, all restorations indicated for replacement were examined as to their real need of replacement by 5 calibrated examiners taking into account the theorical concepts on the proposed criteria for the need of replacing or not. The analyzed period comprised 5 years (2001 to 2005). The criteria adopted for replacement were attached to the data collecting form in order to standardize the analysis of the restorations. Results: 856 patients were treated within the studied period and 753 needed restoration replacement. The main reasons for replacing amalgam restorations were defective marginal adaptation (40.9%), recurent caries (24.1%) and deficient anatomical form (15.4%). The main reasons for replacing resin restorations were esthetics (31.4%), defective marginal adaptation (29.2%) and recurent caries (20.7%). Conclusion: In spite of the little clinical experience of the studied population (undergraduate students), the reasons for replacing restorations were in accordance with the literature, having estehtics as the main reason for the replacement of composite resin restorations and defective marginal adaptation for amalgam restorations.en
dc.format.extent211-215-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectComposite resins-
dc.subjectDental amalgam-
dc.subjectDental restoration-
dc.subjectPermanent-
dc.titleRazões para substituição de restaurações em clínica integradapt
dc.title.alternativeReasons for replacing restorations in the integrated clinicen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Cirurgia e Clínica Integrada Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba (UNESP), Araçatuba/SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Cirurgia e Clínica Integrada Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba (UNESP), Araçatuba/SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.4034/1519.0501.2009.0092.0013-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-75249093004.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofPesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-75249093004-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.