You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/7138
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMessias, Iracimara de Anchieta-
dc.contributor.authorOkuno, Emico-
dc.contributor.authorColacioppo, Sergio-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:23:36Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:44:34Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:23:36Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:44:34Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892011001000004-
dc.identifier.citationRevista Panamericana de Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health. Washington: Pan Amer Health Organization, v. 30, n. 4, p. 309-316, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn1020-4989-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/7138-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/7138-
dc.description.abstractObjective. Measure physical therapists' exposure to the electric and magnetic fields produced by 17 shortwave diathermy devices in physical therapy clinics in the city of Presidente Prudente, São Paulo State, Brazil. Compare the observed values with the exposure levels recommended by the International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Observe the efficacy of Faraday cages as a means of protecting physical therapists from exposure to oscillating electric and magnetic fields.Methods. Electric and magnetic field measurements were taken at four points during actual physical therapy sessions: in proximity to the operator's pelvis and head, the devices' electrical cables, and the electrodes. The measuring equipment was a Wandel & Goltermann EMR-200.Results. The values obtained in proximity to the electrodes and cables were 10 to 30 times higher than ICNIRP's recommended occupational reference levels. In the shortwave diathermy treatment rooms with Faraday cages, the fields were even higher than in treatment rooms not so equipped-principally the magnetic field, where the values were more than 100 times higher than the ICNIRP exposure limit.Conclusions. The electric and magnetic field intensities obtained in this study are generally above the exposure levels recommend in ICNIRP standards. It was also observed that the Faraday cage offers physical therapists no protection, and instead, increases their level of exposure.en
dc.format.extent309-316-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.publisherPan Amer Health Organization-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectOccupational exposureen
dc.subjectradiation, nonionizingen
dc.subjectphysical therapyen
dc.subjectelectromagnetic fieldsen
dc.subjectdiathermyen
dc.subjectshort-wave therapyen
dc.subjectBrazilen
dc.titleOccupational exposure of physical therapists to electric and magnetic fields and the efficacy of Faraday cagesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Inst Fis, BR-01498 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Fac Saúde Publ, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1020-49892011001000004-
dc.identifier.scieloS1020-49892011001000004-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000299527200004-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Panamericana de Salud Publica - Pan American Journal of Public Health-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.