You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71648
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Renata Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorBraga, Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira-
dc.contributor.authorAoki, Tsutomu-
dc.contributor.authorIaconelli Jr., Assumpto-
dc.contributor.authorBorges Jr., Edson-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:40Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:28:30Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:40Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:28:30Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationJornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida, v. 14, n. 2, p. 32-35, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn1517-5693-
dc.identifier.issn1518-0557-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71648-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71648-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of this study was evaluate if the embryos cryopreservation from OHSS patients Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycles could be influence the clinical outcomes when compared to patients who receive oocytes from donors but the endometrium was not prepared and the embryos were cryopreserved. Methods: Fifty eight couples submitted to ICSI cycles in which 26 with OHSS clinical manifestation (OHSS group) and 32 couples who have received oocytes from donors (control group). The embryos were frozen on day+2 or +3of development. All patients included in this study had embryos crypreserved before the transfer, and in the thawing cycle, only the endometrium preparation was performed. The embryo survival, implantation, pregnancy and miscarriage rates were evaluated in the embryo thawing cycle. Results: There was no difference among the groups in relation to fertilization rate (OHSS: 71.89% ± 15.45, Control: 79.75% ± 21.68, p= 0.234), survival embryos rate (OHSS: 68.85 ± 21.10, Control: 59.53 ± 36.79, p= 0.233), high quality embryos rate (OHSS: 25.20 ± 23.90, Control: 27.40 ± 30.30, p= 0.760), implantation rate (OHSS: 17.9 ± 26.9, Control: 12.5 ± 23.7, p= 0.435), pregnancy rate (OHSS: 38.50, Control: 28.60, p= 0.441) and miscarriage rate (OHSS: 40.00, Control: 25.00, p= 0.332). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that clinical outcomes in freeze and thawing cycles were not affected by the presence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome clinical manifestation after controlled ovarian stimulation.en
dc.format.extent32-35-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectEmbryo implantation-
dc.subjectOvarian hyperstimulation syndrome-
dc.subjectPregnancy rate-
dc.subjectSperm injections, intracytoplasmic-
dc.subjectclinical article-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectcryopreservation-
dc.subjectembryo-
dc.subjectembryo development-
dc.subjectembryo transfer-
dc.subjectendometrium-
dc.subjectfemale-
dc.subjectfertilization-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectintracytoplasmic sperm injection-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectnidation-
dc.subjectoocyte donation-
dc.subjectoutcome assessment-
dc.subjectovary hyperstimulation-
dc.subjectpregnancy rate-
dc.subjectspontaneous abortion-
dc.subjectthawing-
dc.titleA síndrome do hiperestímulo ovariano não influencia os resultados clínicos após ciclos de descongelamento de embriões provenientes de ciclos de ICSIpt
dc.title.alternativeThe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome does not influence clinical outcome post embryo thawing cycles originating from ICSI cyclesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionCentro de Fertilização Assistida-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto Sapientiae-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Queesland-
dc.contributor.institutionClínica Step 01-
dc.contributor.institutionIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo-
dc.contributor.institutionFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo-
dc.contributor.institutionFederacao Brasileira Das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationCentro de Fertilização Assistida-
dc.description.affiliationImunologia Universidade de São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Pesquisa Cientifica do Fertility Centro de Fertilização Assistida Instituto Sapientiae-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Queesland-
dc.description.affiliationClínica Step 01-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia-
dc.description.affiliationFederacao Brasileira Das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia-
dc.description.affiliationInstituto Sapientiae-
dc.description.affiliationUrologia Universidade Estadual de São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Medicina de Botucatu-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUrologia Universidade Estadual de São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculdade de Medicina de Botucatu-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77956276931-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.