You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71756
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes-
dc.contributor.authorPavone, Chaine-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Maurício Ribeiro-
dc.contributor.authorMarcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chierici-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:43Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:28:46Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:43Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:28:46Z-
dc.date.issued2010-07-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242010000300010-
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Oral Research, v. 24, n. 3, p. 316-322, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn1806-8324-
dc.identifier.issn1807-3107-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71756-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71756-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of brushing with a Colgate 360° or Oral B Indicator 35 toothbrush on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to extracted human teeth. The bristle wear and bristle tip morphology were also examined after simulated tooth-brushing. Orthodontic brackets (Roth-P/1 st and 2 nd pre-molar S/D- Slot 0.18) were bonded (Transbond XT ®) to the smoothest surface of each of 45 extracted human molar and premolar teeth. Test specimens were randomly divided into three groups: Group 1, control group with no brushing; Group 2, brushing with the Oral B Indicator 35; Group 3, brushing with the Colgate 360°. Samples were adapted to a machine that simulated tooth-brushing. The bond strength of each bracket to each tooth was assessed with a mechanical testing machine. The bristle wear and bristle tip morphology indices were also assessed. Statistically significant differences were defined for p ≤ 0.05. The average bond strengths (range: 90.18-90.89 kgf/cm 2) did not differ among the three groups. The Colgate 360° showed less bristle wear and a better bristle tip morphology than the Oral B Indicator 35 toothbrush. However, use of either toothbrush did not decrease the bond strength of the orthodontic brackets. Therefore, patients undergoing orthodontic therapy can safely use either toothbrush.en
dc.format.extent316-322-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectOrthodontic brackets-
dc.subjectPrimary prevention-
dc.subjectToothbrushing-
dc.subjectresin cement-
dc.subjectdental bonding-
dc.subjectdental care-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectinstrumentation-
dc.subjectmechanical stress-
dc.subjectmethodology-
dc.subjectnonparametric test-
dc.subjectorthodontic device-
dc.subjectshear strength-
dc.subjecttooth brushing-
dc.subjectDental Bonding-
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectOrthodontic Brackets-
dc.subjectResin Cements-
dc.subjectShear Strength-
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric-
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical-
dc.titleEffect of toothbrushing with different manual toothbrushes on the shear bond strength of orthodontic bracketsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery Division of Periodontology, School of Dentistry at Araraquara São Paulo State University, Araraquara, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery Division of Periodontology, School of Dentistry at Araraquara São Paulo State University, Araraquara, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1806-83242010000300010-
dc.identifier.scieloS1806-83242010000300010-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-77957944019.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Oral Research-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77957944019-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.