You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71797
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUllmann, Leila Sabrina-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Rodrigo Costa da-
dc.contributor.authorMoraes, Wanderlei de-
dc.contributor.authorCubas, Zalmir Silvino-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Leonilda Correia dos-
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, Juliano Leônidas-
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, Nei-
dc.contributor.authorGuimarães, Ana Marcia Sá-
dc.contributor.authorMontaño, Patrícia-
dc.contributor.authorLangoni, Hélio-
dc.contributor.authorBiondo, Alexander Welker-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:45Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:28:55Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:28:55Z-
dc.date.issued2010-08-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.013-
dc.identifier.citationVeterinary Parasitology, v. 172, n. 1-2, p. 144-146, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn0304-4017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71797-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71797-
dc.description.abstractToxoplasma gondii is the causative intracellular protozoan of toxoplasmosis in human being and animals. Members of the Felidae family are considered the single definitive host for the infection; both wild and domestic cats are able to excrete oocysts in the environment. Wild cats maintained in captivity may serve as source of infection for other clinically susceptible animals in the same environment. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of T. gondii IgG antibodies in 57 neotropical felids (1 Leopardus geoffroyi; 3 Puma yagouaroundi; 17 Leopardus wiedii; 22 Leopardus tigrinus; and 14 Leopardus pardalis) kept at the Bela Vista Biological Sanctuary, Itaipu Binacional, Southern Brazil, by the modified agglutination test (MAT) using titer 16 as cut-off point. Seropositivity was observed in 38/57 (66.67%; 95% CI 53.66-77.51%) samples, with higher frequency in ocelots (71.43%). Wild-caught felids were three times more likely to be infected when compared to zoo-born animals (P≤ 0.05) and age of wild-caught animals (P= 0.6892; 95% CI. = 0.7528-1.66) was not significant as a risk factor for the infection, the same occurring with zoo-born animals (P= 0.05; 95% CI. = 0.6267-24.052). These results suggest that, despite efforts to control T. gondii infection in zoo facilities, such as individual pens, hygiene monitoring, veterinary care and pre-frozen meat offered as food, non-domestic felids kept in captivity, particularly the wild-caught specimens, may be invariably exposed to infection due to other environmental sources. © 2010 Elsevier B.V.en
dc.format.extent144-146-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectCaptive wild cats-
dc.subjectNeotropical felids-
dc.subjectToxoplasma gondii-
dc.subjectimmunoglobulin G antibody-
dc.subjectagglutination test-
dc.subjectanimal care-
dc.subjectantibody detection-
dc.subjectantibody titer-
dc.subjectBrazil-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectFelidae-
dc.subjectfemale-
dc.subjecthygiene-
dc.subjectLeopardus geoffroyi-
dc.subjectLeopardus pardalis-
dc.subjectLeopardus tigrinus-
dc.subjectLeopardus wiedii-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectmorbidity-
dc.subjectmortality-
dc.subjectNeotropics-
dc.subjectnonhuman-
dc.subjectparasite identification-
dc.subjectPuma yagouaroundi-
dc.subjectserology-
dc.subjectAgglutination Tests-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectAnimals, Wild-
dc.subjectAnimals, Zoo-
dc.subjectAntibodies, Protozoan-
dc.subjectChi-Square Distribution-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectSeroepidemiologic Studies-
dc.subjectToxoplasma-
dc.subjectToxoplasmosis, Animal-
dc.subjectTropical Climate-
dc.subjectAnimalia-
dc.subjectFelis catus-
dc.subjectFelis silvestris-
dc.subjectHerpailurus yaguarondi-
dc.subjectOncifelis geoffroyi-
dc.subjectProtozoa-
dc.titleSerological survey of Toxoplasma gondii in captive Neotropical felids from Southern Brazilen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionRefugio Biologico Bela Vista-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Illinois-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Higiene Veterinaria e Saude Publica Faculdade de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia Universidade do Estado de Sao Paulo, Botucatu, 18618-000-
dc.description.affiliationItaipu Binacional Refugio Biologico Bela Vista, Foz do Iguacu, 85866-900, 85866-900-
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Medicina Veterinaria Campus Palotina, Campus Palotina Universidade Federal do Parana, Palotina, 85950-000-
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Ciencias Biomedicas Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, 05508-900-
dc.description.affiliationDepartmento de Medicina Veterinaria Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, 80035-050-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61802-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.013-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary Parasitology-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77955315348-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.