You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71844
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBandyopadhyay-Ghosh, S.-
dc.contributor.authorFaria, P. E. P.-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, A.-
dc.contributor.authorFelipucci, D. N. B.-
dc.contributor.authorReaney, I. M.-
dc.contributor.authorSalata, L. A.-
dc.contributor.authorBrook, I. M.-
dc.contributor.authorHatton, P. V.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:47Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:29:01Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:47Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:29:01Z-
dc.date.issued2010-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32750-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A, v. 94, n. 3, p. 760-768, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn1549-3296-
dc.identifier.issn1552-4965-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71844-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71844-
dc.description.abstractModified fluorcanasite glasses were fabricated by either altering the molar ratios of Na 2O and CaO or by adding P 2O 5 to the parent stoichiometric glass compositions. Glasses were converted to glass-ceramics by a controlled two-stage heat treatment process. Rods (2 mm x 4 mm) were produced using the conventional lost-wax casting technique. Osteoconductive 45S5 bioglass was used as a reference material. Biocompatibility and osteoconductivity were investigated by implantation into healing defects (2 mm) in the midshaft of rabbit femora. Tissue response was investigated using conventional histology and scanning electron microscopy. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of specimens after 12 weeks implantation showed significantly more bone contact with the surface of 45S5 bioglass implants when compared with other test materials. When the bone contact for each material was compared between experimental time points, the Glass-Ceramic 2 (CaO rich) group showed significant difference (p = 0.027) at 4 weeks, but no direct contact at 12 weeks. Histology and backscattered electron photomicrographs showed that modified fluorcanasite glass-ceramic implants had greater osteoconductivity than the parent stoichiometric composition. Of the new materials, fluorcanasite glass-ceramic implants modified by the addition of P 2O 5 showed the greatest stimulation of new mineralized bone tissue formation adjacent to the implants after 4 and 12 weeks implantation. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en
dc.format.extent760-768-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subject45S5 bioglass-
dc.subjectBone tissue-
dc.subjectFluorcanasite-
dc.subjectGlass-ceramic-
dc.subjectIn vivo biocompatibility-
dc.subjectOsteoconductivity-
dc.subjectBackscattered electrons-
dc.subjectBio-glass-
dc.subjectBone contacts-
dc.subjectDirect contact-
dc.subjectGlass compositions-
dc.subjectHeat treatment process-
dc.subjectIn-vivo-
dc.subjectMineralized bone-
dc.subjectMolar ratio-
dc.subjectNew material-
dc.subjectOsteoconductive-
dc.subjectReference material-
dc.subjectStoichiometric compositions-
dc.subjectTest materials-
dc.subjectTime points-
dc.subjectTissue response-
dc.subjectTwo stage-
dc.subjectWax casting-
dc.subjectBiocompatibility-
dc.subjectGlass ceramics-
dc.subjectHistology-
dc.subjectScanning electron microscopy-
dc.subjectSecondary batteries-
dc.subjectSodium-
dc.subjectBone-
dc.subjectfluorcanasite glass-
dc.subjectglass-
dc.subjectunclassified drug-
dc.subjectanimal experiment-
dc.subjectanimal model-
dc.subjectanimal tissue-
dc.subjectbiocompatibility-
dc.subjectbone defect-
dc.subjectbone remodeling-
dc.subjectbone tissue augmentation-
dc.subjectbone tissue repair-
dc.subjectceramics-
dc.subjectfemale-
dc.subjectfemur shaft-
dc.subjecthistopathology-
dc.subjectmorphometrics-
dc.subjectnonhuman-
dc.subjectrabbit-
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopy-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectBiocompatible Materials-
dc.subjectBone and Bones-
dc.subjectBone Substitutes-
dc.subjectCeramics-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectImplants, Experimental-
dc.subjectMaterials Testing-
dc.subjectRabbits-
dc.subjectRandom Allocation-
dc.subjectSilicates-
dc.titleOsteoconductivity of modified fluorcanasite glass-ceramics for bone tissue augmentation and repairen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionSir Robert Hadfield Building-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Sheffield-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Engineering Materials University of Sheffield Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD-
dc.description.affiliationCentre for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering School of Clinical Dentistry University of Sheffield, Claremount Crescent, Sheffield S10 2TA-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dentistry of Araçatuba University of the State of São Paulo, Sao Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jbm.a.32750-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77954793403-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.