You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71954
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMichida, S. M.-
dc.contributor.authorSouza, R. O.-
dc.contributor.authorBottino, M. A.-
dc.contributor.authorValandro, L. F.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:50Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:30:19Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:50Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:30:19Z-
dc.date.issued2010-11-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/minerva-stomatologica/article.php?cod=R18Y2010N12A0633-
dc.identifier.citationMinerva stomatologica, v. 59, n. 11-12, p. 633-636, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn0026-4970-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71954-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71954-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to assess the influence of resin cement insertion methods on the bond strength of a fiber post to root dentin and quality of the cement layer. Forty bovine single-roots (length =16 mm) were randomly allocated into four groups, according to the cement insertion methods (N.=10): Gr1- Lentulo drill #40, Gr2- Centrix syringe, Gr3- Explorer #5, Gr4- fiber post. The root canals were prepared at 12 mm, using preparation bur # 3 of a cylinder quartz-FRC post (Aesthet post-plus, Bisco). The fiber posts were cemented using a multi-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (All Bond 2®, Bisco) and a dual-cured resin cement (Duolink, Bisco). Each root was cut into seven samples: four samples of 1.8 mm thickness for push-out testing, and three with 0.5 mm for cement layer quality analyzing. One-way ANOVA was used for the push-out test values and the One-Way Kruskal-Wallis (P<0.05) and Dunn (10%) tests for the cement layer analyzes. ANOVA showed that the cement layer quality was affected by the cement insertion methods (P=0.0044): Gr1 (3.8 ± 1.3a), Gr2 (3.2 ± 1.3a), Gr3 (5.2 ± 1.5a,b) and Gr4 (5.2 ± 1.5b) (Dunn test), whereas the bond strength (MPa) was not affected by cement insertion methods: G1 (4.2 ± 1.3), G2 (3.2 ± 1.8), G3 (4.5 ± 0.9), G4 (3.1 ± 1.3). The fiber posts should be cemented with the assistance of the lentulo drill or centrix syringe to promote the best cement layer results.en
dc.format.extent633-636-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjecttooth cement-
dc.subjectanimal-
dc.subjectcattle-
dc.subjectdental bonding-
dc.subjectdentin-
dc.subjecttooth crown-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectCattle-
dc.subjectDental Bonding-
dc.subjectDental Cements-
dc.subjectDentin-
dc.subjectPost and Core Technique-
dc.titleCementation of fiber post: influence of the cement insertion techniques on the bond strength of the fiber post-root dentin and the quality of the cement layer.en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofMinerva stomatologica-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79957966696-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.