You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/72632
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCricchio, Giovanni-
dc.contributor.authorPalma, Vinicious Canavarros-
dc.contributor.authorFaria, Paolo E. P.-
dc.contributor.authorOlivera, José Americo de-
dc.contributor.authorLundgren, Stefan-
dc.contributor.authorSennerby, Lars-
dc.contributor.authorSalata, Luiz A.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:25:59Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:34:23Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:25:59Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:34:23Z-
dc.date.issued2011-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00208.x-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, v. 13, n. 3, p. 224-230, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899-
dc.identifier.issn1708-8208-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/72632-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/72632-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Previous studies have pointed out that the mere elevation of the maxillary sinus membrane promotes bone formation without the use of augmentation materials. Purpose: This experimental study aimed at evaluating if the two-stage procedure for sinus floor augmentation could benefit from the use of a space-making device in order to increase the bone volume to enable later implant installation with good primary stability. Materials and Methods: Six male tufted capuchin primates (Cebus apella) were subjected to extraction of the three premolars and the first molar on both sides of the maxilla to create an edentulous area. The sinuses were opened using the lateral bone-wall window technique, and the membrane was elevated. One resorbable space-making device was inserted in each maxillary sinus, and the bone window was returned in place. The animals were euthanatized after 6 months, and biopsy blocks containing the whole maxillary sinus and surrounding soft tissues were prepared for ground sections. Results: The histological examination of the specimens showed bone formation in contact with both the schneiderian membrane and the device in most cases even when the device was displaced. The process of bone formation indicates that this technique is potentially useful for two-stage sinus floor augmentation. The lack of stabilization of the device within the sinus demands further improvement of space-makers for predictable bone augmentation. Conclusions: It is concluded that (1) the device used in this study did not trigger any important inflammatory reaction; (2) when the sinus membrane was elevated, bone formation was a constant finding; and (3) an ideal space-making device should be stable and elevate the membrane to ensure a maintained connection between the membrane and the secluded space. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en
dc.format.extent224-230-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAugmentation-
dc.subjectBone formation-
dc.subjectEndosseous implants-
dc.subjectMaxillary sinus-
dc.subjectSinus membrane elevation-
dc.subjectanimal-
dc.subjectbiodegradable implant-
dc.subjectbone development-
dc.subjectCebus-
dc.subjectimplant-
dc.subjectinstrumentation-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectmaxillary sinus-
dc.subjectmethodology-
dc.subjectnose mucosa-
dc.subjectphysiology-
dc.subjectsinus floor augmentation-
dc.subjectAbsorbable Implants-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectImplants, Experimental-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectMaxillary Sinus-
dc.subjectNasal Mucosa-
dc.subjectOsteogenesis-
dc.subjectSinus Floor Augmentation-
dc.titleHistological outcomes on the development of new space-making devices for maxillary sinus floor augmentationen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUmeå University-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de Cuiabá (UNIC)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionGothenburg University-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Umeå University, Umeå-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Integrated Clinic Faculty of Dentistry of Cuiabá University of Cuiabá, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dentistry of Aracatuba University of the State of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Basic Sciences Faculty of Dentistry of Aracatuba University of the State of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biomaterials Gothenburg University, Gothenburg-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontics Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00208.x-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79960951913-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.