You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/73087
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDe Assis Sobreira, Pedro-
dc.contributor.authorVillalva, Marcelo Gradella-
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Pedro Gomes-
dc.contributor.authorBraga, Henrique Antônio Carvalho-
dc.contributor.authorGazoli, Jonas Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorRuppert, Ernesto-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, André Augusto-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:26:20Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:36:22Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:26:20Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:36:22Z-
dc.date.issued2011-12-28-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/COBEP.2011.6085179-
dc.identifier.citationCOBEP 2011 - 11th Brazilian Power Electronics Conference, p. 858-863.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/73087-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/73087-
dc.description.abstractMaximum Power Point tracking (MPPT) in photovoltaic (PV) systems may be achieved by controlling either the voltage or current of the PV device. There is no consensus in the technical literature about how is the best choice. This paper provides a comparative analysis performance among current and voltage control using two different MPPT strategies: the perturb and observe (P&O) and the incremental conductance techniques. © 2011 IEEE.en
dc.format.extent858-863-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectcurrent control-
dc.subjectmaximum power point tracking-
dc.subjectMPPT-
dc.subjectphotovoltaic system-
dc.subjectvoltage control-
dc.subjectBest choice-
dc.subjectComparative analysis-
dc.subjectIncremental conductance-
dc.subjectPerturb and observe-
dc.subjectPhotovoltaic systems-
dc.subjectTechnical literature-
dc.subjectVoltage-controlled-
dc.subjectElectric current control-
dc.subjectPower electronics-
dc.subjectVoltage control-
dc.subjectPhotovoltaic effects-
dc.titleComparative analysis of current and voltage-controlled photovoltaic Maximum Power Point trackingen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionNucleus of Automation and Power Electronics - NAEP-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Juiz de Fora (UFJF) Nucleus of Automation and Power Electronics - NAEP Campus UFJF, Juiz de Fora, MG 36036-330-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista UNESP, Sorocaba, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Campinas UNICAMP, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista UNESP, Sorocaba, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/COBEP.2011.6085179-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofCOBEP 2011 - 11th Brazilian Power Electronics Conference-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84255166451-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record Show full item record   View Statistics
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.