You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/73318
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Vital Paulino-
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, Hamilton-
dc.contributor.authorPaolera, Mauricio Della-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Maria Rosa Bet de Moraes-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:26:30Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:37:15Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:26:30Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:37:15Z-
dc.date.issued2012-05-05-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S30717-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Ophthalmology, v. 6, n. 1, p. 699-706, 2012.-
dc.identifier.issn1177-5467-
dc.identifier.issn1177-5483-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/73318-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/73318-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of transitioning patients whose intraocular pressure (IOP) had been insufficiently controlled on prostaglandin analog (PGA) monotherapy to treatment with travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination with benzalkonium chloride (TTFC). Methods: This prospective, multicenter, open-label, historical controlled, single-arm study transitioned patients who had primary open-angle glaucoma, pigment dispersion glaucoma, or ocular hypertension and who required further IOP reduction from PGA monotherapy to oncedaily treatment with TTFC for 12 weeks. IOP and safety (adverse events, corrected distance visual acuity, and slit-lamp biomicroscopy) were assessed at baseline, week 4, and week 12. A solicited ocular symptom survey was administered at baseline and at week 12. Patients and investigators reported their medication preference at week 12. Results: Of 65 patients enrolled, 43 had received prior travoprost therapy and 22 had received prior nontravoprost therapy (n = 18, bimatoprost; n = 4, latanoprost). In the total population, mean IOP was significantly reduced from baseline (P = 0.000009), showing a 16.8% reduction after 12 weeks of TTFC therapy. In the study subgroups, mean IOP was significantly reduced from baseline to week 12 (P = 0.0001) in the prior travoprost cohort (19.0% reduction) and in the prior nontravoprost cohort (13.1% reduction). Seven mild, ocular, treatment-related adverse events were reported. Of the ten ocular symptom questions, eight had numerically lower percentages with TTFC compared with prior PGA monotherapy and two had numerically higher percentages with TTFC (dry eye symptoms and ocular stinging/burning). At week 12, TTFC was preferred over prior therapy for 84.2% of patients (48 of 57) by the patients themselves, and for 94.7% of patients (54 of 57) by their physicians. Conclusion: When TTFC replaced PGA monotherapy in patients whose IOP had been uncontrolled, the outcome was a significant reduction in IOP and an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. Most patients and investigators preferred TTFC to prior PGA monotherapy. © 2012 Costa et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.en
dc.format.extent699-706-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectFixed combination-
dc.subjectGlaucoma-
dc.subjectIntraocular pressure-
dc.subjectProstaglandin analog-
dc.subjectTimolol-
dc.subjectTravoprost-
dc.subjectbenzalkonium chloride-
dc.subjectbimatoprost-
dc.subjecteye drops-
dc.subjectlatanoprost-
dc.subjectprostaglandin derivative-
dc.subjecttimolol plus travoprost-
dc.subjecttravoprost-
dc.subjectabnormal sensation-
dc.subjectadult-
dc.subjectadverse outcome-
dc.subjectaged-
dc.subjectblepharitis-
dc.subjectclinical assessment-
dc.subjectclinical effectiveness-
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trial-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectdisease control-
dc.subjectdose response-
dc.subjectdrug efficacy-
dc.subjectdrug hypersensitivity-
dc.subjectdrug safety-
dc.subjectdrug tolerability-
dc.subjectdrug withdrawal-
dc.subjectdry eye-
dc.subjectevening dosage-
dc.subjecteye burning-
dc.subjecteye disease-
dc.subjecteye redness-
dc.subjectfemale-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectintraocular hypertension-
dc.subjectintraocular pressure abnormality-
dc.subjectmajor clinical study-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectmonotherapy-
dc.subjectmulticenter study-
dc.subjectocular pruritus-
dc.subjectopen angle glaucoma-
dc.subjectopen study-
dc.subjectoutcome assessment-
dc.subjectslit lamp-
dc.subjecttreatment duration-
dc.subjectvisual acuity-
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination as transition therapy in patients previously on prostaglandin analog monotherapyen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)-
dc.contributor.institutionSanta Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP, Rua Mato Grosso, 306, Higienopolis, 01239-040 São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba-
dc.description.affiliationSanta Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Medicina de Botucatu UNESP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculdade de Medicina de Botucatu UNESP-
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/OPTH.S30717-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-84863433622.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Ophthalmology-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84863433622-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.