You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74117
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarocho, Susana María Salazar-
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu-
dc.contributor.authorAmaral, Regina-
dc.contributor.authorValandro, Luiz Felipe-
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antonio-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:27:27Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:40:46Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:27:27Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:40:46Z-
dc.date.issued2013-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0668-y-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Investigations, v. 17, n. 1, p. 325-331, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981-
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74117-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74117-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different seating forces during cementation in cement-ceramic microtensile bond strength (μTBS). Materials and methods: Forty-five blocks (5 × 5 × 4 mm3) of a glass-infiltrated alumina-based ceramic (In-Ceram Alumina) were fabricated according to the manufacturer's instructions and duplicated in resin composite. Ceramic surfaces were polished, cleaned for 10 min in an ultrasonic bath, silica coated using a laboratory type of air abrasion device, and silanized. Each treated ceramic block was then randomly assigned to five groups (n = 9) and cemented to a composite block under five seating forces (10 g, 50 g, 100 g, 500 g, and 750 g) using a dual-cured resin cement (Panavia F). The ceramic-cement-composite assemblies were cut under coolant water to obtain bar specimens (1 mm × 0. 8 mm2). The μTBS tests were performed in a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). The mean bond strengths values were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA (α ≤ 0. 05). Results: Different seating forces resulted in no significant difference in the μTBS results ranging between 13. 1 ± 4. 7 and 18. 8 ± 2. 1 MPa (p = 0. 13) and no significant differences among cement thickness. Conclusions: Excessive seating forces during cementation seem not to affect the μTBS results. Clinical relevance: Excessive forces during the seating of single all-ceramic restorations cementation seem to display the same tensile bond strength to the resin cement. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.en
dc.format.extent325-331-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectCementation-
dc.subjectGlass-infiltrated alumina-based ceramic-
dc.subjectMicrotensile bond strength-
dc.subjectSeating forces-
dc.titleEffect of seating forces on cement-ceramic adhesion in microtensile bond testsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zürich-
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Santa Maria-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University-UNESP, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDental Materials Unit, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science University of Zürich, Zürich-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University-UNESP, São Paulo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-011-0668-y-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000313072200037-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigations-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84871939065-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.