You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74208
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDe Bortoli, Sergio A.-
dc.contributor.authorVacari, Alessandra M.-
dc.contributor.authorGoulart, Roberto M.-
dc.contributor.authorFerraudo, Antonio S.-
dc.contributor.authorVolpe, Haroldo X.L.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:27:29Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:41:01Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:27:29Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:41:01Z-
dc.date.issued2013-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2013.765057-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Pest Management, v. 59, n. 1, p. 73-78, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn0967-0874-
dc.identifier.issn1366-5863-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74208-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74208-
dc.description.abstractWe compared different cultivars and hybrids of crucifers in relation to development and life-history of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) to classify the plants according to their resistance to the pest. The plants used were Manteiga da Geórgia kale, Bola de Neve cauliflower, Ramoso Piracicaba Precoce broccoli, Chato-de-quintal cabbage, and the hybrid cabbages Midori, TPC668, TPC308, and TPC681. We evaluated performance daily until the pupal stage. Pupae were assessed individually to determine the pupal weight, performance, and pupal period. We determined the sex ratio, fecundity, fertility, and longevity of the emerged adults and calculated their reproductive potential. Cabbage hybrids TPC668, TPC308, and TPC681 do not support the development and reproduction of the diamondback moth. These hybrids show a level of resistance that is similar to that found the commercially available hybrid Midori and cultivar Chato de Quintal, which are known to be resistant to the diamondback moth. This finding implies that the capitata (cabbage) cultivars are the most suitable for planting because they are more resistant to pest than the cultivar's moth, acephala (kale). © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.en
dc.format.extent73-78-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectBrassica oleraceae-
dc.subjectcultivar resistance-
dc.subjectPlutella xylostella-
dc.subjectreproductive potential-
dc.subjectcrop performance-
dc.subjectcultivar-
dc.subjectfecundity-
dc.subjectfertility-
dc.subjecthybrid-
dc.subjectlife history-
dc.subjectlongevity-
dc.subjectmoth-
dc.subjectpest control-
dc.subjectpest resistance-
dc.subjectplant-
dc.subjectsex ratio-
dc.subjectAcephala-
dc.subjectBrassica-
dc.subjectBrassica oleracea-
dc.subjectBrassica oleracea var. botrytis-
dc.subjectBrassica oleracea var. capitata-
dc.subjectBrassica oleracea var. italica-
dc.subjectBrassicaceae-
dc.subjectCapitata-
dc.subjectLepidoptera-
dc.subjectPlutellidae-
dc.titleClassification of crucifer cultivars based on the life-history of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella)en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Plant Protection College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences Sao Paulo State University/UNESP, Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Exact Science College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences Sao Paulo State University/UNESP, Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Plant Protection College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences Sao Paulo State University/UNESP, Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Exact Science College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences Sao Paulo State University/UNESP, Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09670874.2013.765057-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000316061300009-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Pest Management-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84874770822-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.